Talk:Draumkvedet
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
The reconstruction angle
It should be mentioned in this article that several scholars doubt that there's really an original medieaval visionary poem. It's beyond doubt that the canonized version is a construction (by Moltke Moe), entirely dependent on the idea that there was such an original, bringing together verses that's not related in known tradition. — Linkomfod (talk) 02:45, 19 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Draumkvedet. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071014061541/http://mic.no:80/mic.nsf/doc/art2002092015073189958342 to http://www.mic.no/mic.nsf/doc/art2002092015073189958342
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)