Talk:Diet of Speyer (1529)

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Germany Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article lacks sufficient references and/or adequate inline citations. Once references have been added, remove the |unref= from this template. Former countries: Holy Roman Empire This article is within the scope of WikiProject Former countries, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of defunct states and territories (and their subdivisions). If you would like to participate, please join the project.Former countriesWikipedia:WikiProject Former countriesTemplate:WikiProject Former countriesformer country articles This article is supported by the Holy Roman Empire task force.

This article seems short enough to safely accomodate the whole of Protestation at Speyer, in my opinion. The Protestation seems to have been the main event. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 11:23, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I'd rather merge them the other way 'round. The Article on the second has nothing but backround to the Protestation, merge it into the Protestation article. While we're at it it's the Protestation of Speyer not at Speyer.Sumergocognito 16:06, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Second Diet of Speyer and Protestation at Speyer are about different things, like Diet of Worms and Edict of Worms, or Augsburg Confession and Apology of the Augsburg Confession; therefore is better to leave it as is Kmorozov 04:57, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That works for me too.Sumergocognito 15:39, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Makes sense. I've removed the merge tags. --Sam Blanning^(talk) 15:43, 12 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]