Talk:Deanery of Cadbury

This article was nominated for deletion on 21 June 2015. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Anglicanism Low‑importance Deanery of Cadbury is part of WikiProject Anglicanism, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to Anglicanism and the Anglican Communion. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AnglicanismWikipedia:WikiProject AnglicanismTemplate:WikiProject AnglicanismAnglicanism articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Devon Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Devon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Devon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DevonWikipedia:WikiProject DevonTemplate:WikiProject DevonDevon articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article has been marked as needing immediate attention. This article has been marked as needing an infobox.

I propose merging Deanery of Cadbury and Deanery of Christianity (Exeter) into Archdeaconry of Exeter (currently redirects to Archdeacon of Exeter, but that could be changed).

The consensus of a 2015 AFD discussion was that deaneries should generally be merged into archdeaconries. The merger would also address a general lack of sources on the deanery, which makes it hard to meet reasonable notability standards for a stand-alone article.— Moriwen (talk) 16:22, 2 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose; the 2015 consensus was to keep, but that merge proposals could be persued. I don't think that picking off one Deanery to merge into the Achrdeacon's page would be helpful, even if you moved their page to an Archdeaconry page. Hence, I think that current structure works for readers. It needs better referencing though! Klbrain (talk) 09:05, 29 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]