Talk:Corruption in Thailand

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

[Untitled]

Regarding the unsourced entry implicating Yingluck, it is dishonest to include this without mentioning the questionable nature of the corruption commision of Thailand. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.40.60.69 (talk) 10:29, 6 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Recentism and POV

I would like to point out obvious problems of this article including:

  1. The article is bias in favor of the current junta because it only mentions actions on corruption but says nothing on the corruption allegation on the current junta itself
  2. It also does not mention past government's corruption, both civilian and military. History might be included as well since corruption has always been one of the rationale to launch a coup in Thailand.
  3. Multiple sections could be created such as voting fraud, abuse of power, etc. --Horus (talk) 17:35, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ive made some changes that have addressed the huge bias in favor of the NCPO that there was before. I still feel that the article needs a bit more work though before the neutrality tag can be removed. Wikiman5676 (talk) 02:55, 4 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the neutrality tag, as the article has been significantly changed to address that issue since. Wikiman5676 (talk) 03:37, 8 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]