Talk:Corn kernel
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
|
Unsupported claims under Biomass
Under the Biomass section is the second paragraph and third paragraph relevant to the article as they refer to bioenergy in general and not corn kernels? There are no specific references to information that supports the claims in the three paragraphs under biomass, there is also no mention of the disadvantages of bioenergy (takes land from food production, carbon produced from burning biomass, increased energy transportation costs due to lower fuel density). — Preceding unsigned comment added by GR8DAN (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
How May Kernels on a Cob
One place says 600. Another says 800. Both sentences imply that this is the average. Which is it? 65.93.145.232 (talk) 20:17, 22 August 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Corn kernel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110715174604/http://greenerpastures.responsiblepersonalfinance.com/2008/03/24/how-big-is-the-biofuel-footprint/ to http://greenerpastures.responsiblepersonalfinance.com/2008/03/24/how-big-is-the-biofuel-footprint/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:28, 13 August 2017 (UTC)