Talk:Conduit (The X-Files)/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 05:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• "which would go on become" go on to become
• "find that her younger brother" Needs clarification as to whose younger brother this refers to.
• "similarities to his own childhood" Childhood experience?
• "and has not been seen since" never to be seen again or somesuch? Seems a little disjointed.
• Lake Okobogee links to a disambig page, should be: East Okoboji Lake
• I think zeroes is more common that zeros and Webster yields Zeroes as well...
• "episode they wrote" Space after the dot between the ref. Needs removal.
• "reestablished" re-est
• "with the episode being describing it as" with the episode being described as?

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): --> (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): -->

   A few MoS and prose issues, nothing too serious.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): (citations to reliable sources): (OR):

   Perfic'.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): (focused):

   Perfic'.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   Perfic'

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Perfic'.

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Perfic'

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 05:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for taking the time to review this. I have addressed the points you've raised, taking your suggestions in all cases but the fourth, where I instead just removed the disjointed-sounding clause. GRAPPLE X 15:05, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Passed. Good show. That Ole Cheesy Dude ^{(Talk to the hand!)} 15:39, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! GRAPPLE X 15:40, 18 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]