Talk:Concordat of Bologna
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Concordat of Bologna. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060906130454/http://www.boisestate.edu/courses/reformation/france/16thc.shtml to http://www.boisestate.edu/courses/reformation/france/16thc.shtml
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:59, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Unsupported over-generalization
The following paragraph occurs in the article:
For many years, the kings of France would struggle to keep the Catholic Church in power, as it was filled with supporters of their policies. This would lead to persecution of non-Catholics under Francis I, Henry II, Francis II, and Charles IX.
Gross generalizations of a partisan sort, unsupported by any argument or reference. Fails to mention, let alone discuss, the rise of the Huguenots, the wars of religion, papal opposition to French expansion in Italy (It might even plausibly be said that the Catholic Church was filled with opponents of the King of France's policy), Spanish efforts (including invasion) to keep French dissenters out of Spanish territory and to prevent France from becoming Protestant.
The superficial remark quoted really should be heavily revised, with appropriate supporting argument and reference, or else deleted.