Talk:Components of jet engines
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Splitting this Article Up?
I think this article serves a useful purpose in that it provides a single place, full of pretty good explanations, of jet engine components. However, I think the bulk of this article should be covered in separate articles for each component, with only a definition and a link left here. Does that make sense? -SidewinderX (talk) 15:25, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I am about to edit 'Propelling nozzle', see talk,and see most of the content is in this article also. Having editted 'P n' I would need to delete the stuff in this article.Pieter1963 (talk) 01:21, 4 January 2014 (UTC)
DSI please
This is the obvious place to include the F-35 and J-20 DSIs, right? Hcobb (talk) 20:16, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
Reference 1 has bad link
The link for reference 1 does not exist. Pklemm (talk) 17:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)
Nozzles section
The content of most of this section is identical to what was in main article "Propelling nozzle" until I changed P n recently, see Talk for reasons. I propose deleting this section's content leaving not much more than a one-liner and its Main article ref.Pieter1963 (talk) 21:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC) DonePieter1963 (talk) 23:31, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
Spools
Can we PLEASE get a section that discusses what a "spool" is, i.e. a "twin-spool engine", and some redirects to bring people to this page. I just left a comment on the page on Turbofan about the fact that it doesn't explain anywhere what a "spool" (or shaft) is, and that if you search for "twin-spool", you ended up on a disambiguation page for "spool" that doesn't say anything about "spools" as a jet engine component. Whenever I find and article that says an engine is "twin-spool", there is nothing to link to, except "turbofan", yet it doesn't explain it on that page either. I only found this page by accident a few minutes later, because I never would have thought to search for a page called "Components of jet engines" (I would have assumed the page on turbofan would have had a link to it somewhere if it existed, even if I had thought of it). When I saw it, I said to myself "oh, so there is a page that probably explains what a spool it, and I can just link to that from now on". Only I find that it doesn't say anything about "spools" on here either. It would be nice if one could search for "twin-spool turbofan" and end up on either "turbofan" or this page, and if either page actually said anything about it. That way I could actually link to one of the two pages whenever I find an article that mentions that an engine is a "twin-spool" or "two-shaft" turbofan, but offers no clue as to what that means. Right now it's like an beginner trying to learn about internal combustion engines, and finding a bunch of references to "pistons", but not a single page that actually says what "piston" means in automotive terms..45Colt 05:40, 11 August 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Components of jet engines. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090114181311/http://www.aoxj32.dsl.pipex.com/NewFiles/HTWCombustion.html to http://www.aoxj32.dsl.pipex.com/NewFiles/HTWCombustion.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:24, 11 August 2017 (UTC)