Talk:Company (2002 film)/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Ssven2 (talk · contribs) 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
I will review this article. Thank you. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 14:28, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
- This is a gangster film as opposed to being just a crime film.
- "tension arises" — Should be "tensions arise"
- "after a meeting with a man named Haneef" — Can be rephrased as "after meeting a man named Haneef"
- "Malik and Chandu kill Saeed and his brother Anis in the rear seat of a car." — Elaborate on who Saeed is to let readers know why Malik and Chandu killed him and Anis.
- "His rival gang leader and colleague under Aslam's umbrella Sharma, who was in a meeting with police inspector Rathod, is killed." — Who is Aslam and who was the cast member who played him? If he's not that important, remove him from the sentence altogether.
- Wikilink Home Minister.
- "Haneef was shot dead a few months after Varma met him" — Did it impact the film in anyway? If not, it seems unnecessary and can be removed.
- "He later met several crime reporters, police officers and associates of gangsters" — Regarding the film? if so, state that in the sentence.
- What did Varma mean by "profound-sounding"?
- Of course, wikilink the references on the first instance of them being mentioned.
That's about it from me. Resolve these comments, Yashthepunisher and the article will be promoted. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 10:53, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
- Ssven2 All done. Thanks for the review. Yashthepunisher (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2019 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall: Passed, my queries were met and solved by the nominator.
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Thank you for addressing my comments, Yashthepunisher. Congratulations, the article has passed. — Ssven2 Looking at you, kid 04:08, 4 May 2019 (UTC)