Search results

Results 1 – 20 of 92,860
Advanced search

Search in namespaces:

There is a page named "Talk:Closing argument" on Wikipedia

View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
  • (talk) 22:45, 1 May 2013 (UTC) In the first paragraph, it says, "A closing argument may not contain any new information and may only use evidence introduced...
    1 KB (120 words) - 09:11, 11 January 2024
  • between Closing argument. I believe that article that should take priority over this page, and this page's current title (Closing Arguments) should point...
    813 bytes (119 words) - 17:29, 30 January 2024
  • French term La nouvelle rhetorique in 1958 to describe an approach to argument which is not reduced to application of formal rules of inference The idea...
    76 KB (11,890 words) - 15:12, 7 August 2011
  • to be deleted. In case it's not that obvious for you guys: Plantinga's argument can be summarized as this: (1) It's possible (in a modal sense) that there...
    84 KB (12,792 words) - 04:39, 5 January 2024
  • Moved to arguments page. --Trovatore (talk) 06:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC) Moved to arguments page. --Trovatore (talk) 06:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC) "In his 1891...
    13 KB (1,730 words) - 04:13, 23 May 2024
  • This review is transcluded from Talk:Quine–Putnam indispensability argument/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review...
    28 KB (5,478 words) - 03:46, 9 February 2024
  • [contradictory]" It is not contradictory. It is the whole point of the argument! This is what special relativity tells us. Betaneptune (talk) 07:28, 9...
    29 KB (4,697 words) - 20:33, 22 January 2024
  • As it currently stands it presents the argument as if it a valid logical argument which it definitely is not. It downplays the refutations of it as if...
    98 KB (15,157 words) - 18:36, 8 April 2024
  • This page is for arguments over the validity of 0.999.... This is not an archive; you may feel free to edit this page. Please use this page for comments...
    77 KB (12,605 words) - 12:59, 1 May 2024
  • there is no argument to prove existence of God while in philosophy of religion we have many such argument such as Seddiqin,ontological argument, cosmological...
    38 KB (5,799 words) - 06:15, 17 February 2024
  • should have cited it. The "A brief history of argument mapping" section of the chapter closely follows Argument map § History. There is essentially nothing...
    4 KB (514 words) - 11:07, 9 February 2024
  • made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made...
    2 KB (203 words) - 00:34, 25 January 2024
  • 2006 (UTC) I'm pleased that the criticism section now represents the arguments of academics, but I wonder if they are representative of the dominant...
    199 KB (30,102 words) - 16:25, 29 January 2023
  • 86 bytes (0 words) - 17:29, 30 January 2024
  • the argument "...will observe a mixture of oil and water separate because oil and water do not mix..." - I can see that this is written to avoid close paraphrasing...
    13 KB (1,556 words) - 14:18, 13 May 2022
  • why not do active closers by team? That would keep the list devoid of the roaming "current established closers" who aren't closing at the moment -- those...
    23 KB (3,466 words) - 17:28, 30 January 2024
  • Below is an argument about a link. I think that this argument is teetering dangerously close to personal attacks (although I did not see any). I did not...
    82 KB (13,417 words) - 15:49, 2 February 2023
  • scientific criticism is that they were not based on sources that discuss this argument. If we can just use any sources to make our own claims, why not cite the...
    3 KB (315 words) - 11:08, 9 February 2024
  • copied from Argument (disambiguation). The latter content was more inclusive (adding Argument principle) and conforms to MOS:DAB more closely. This leads...
    800 bytes (112 words) - 18:11, 15 June 2010
  • heard it used so many times in discussion groups etc. I prefer to call it 'Argument from Wikipedia', in which amateur logicians link to the fallacy entries...
    22 KB (3,032 words) - 13:37, 25 January 2024
View (previous 20 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)