Talk:Christmas tree bill
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This page has been transwikied to Wiktionary. The article has content that is useful at Wiktionary. Therefore the article can be found at either here or here (logs 1 logs 2.) Note: This means that the article has been copied to the Wiktionary Transwiki namespace for evaluation and formatting. It does not mean that the article is in the Wiktionary main namespace, or that it has been removed from Wikipedia's. Furthermore, the Wiktionarians might delete the article from Wiktionary if they do not find it to be appropriate for the Wiktionary. Removing this tag will usually trigger CopyToWiktionaryBot to re-transwiki the entry. This article should have been removed from Category:Copy to Wiktionary and should not be re-added there. |
Moving to Wikitionary
This article should not be moved to Wikitonary. It is a term used in Congress and the page is expandable. It is no way part of the English language. --Ineffable3000 00:39, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
2007-02-1 Automated pywikipediabot message
--CopyToWiktionaryBot 03:07, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
Too many cleanup tags
@Mr. Guye: Earlier this year, you added several cleanup tags to this article, but the reasons for these cleanup tags have not yet been discussed on this talk page. Is there any specific reason for the {{essay-like}} tag on this article? Jarble (talk) 06:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Jarble: I've removed the template at issue, as I no longer believe it has an essay-like feel though I still don't like the tone. --Mr. Guye (talk) 21:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)