Talk:Chelsea station (MBTA)
Appearance
![]() | Chelsea station (MBTA) has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: January 11, 2022. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Chelsea station (MBTA) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Chelsea station (MBTA)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Eviolite (talk · contribs) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
I'll be looking at this one tomorrow. eviolite (talk) 07:00, 9 January 2022 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
Images:
- All good - haven't seen annotated images being used for crops before, but it's probably fine
- Although, the caption for the map should read "East Everett station" instead of "The station" as it's ambiguous
Done
Sourcing:
- Not sure what the Flickr image is meant to be citing
- Otherwise, everything is good
Lead:
- "The Boston and Maine Railroad and predecessor Eastern Railroad served an East Everett station nearby from 1880 until around 1950." This feels a bit awkward, maybe "From 1880 to around 1950, the Eastern Railroad and the Boston and Maine Railroad served East Everett station, near modern-day Chelsea station."? I'd just prefer to make it explicit the connection between the old railroads and this station
Done Reworded.
Station layout:
- "at Everett Avenue" - maybe "on"?
Done Reworded.
- What does "high-level" mean in this context?
Done Wikilinked.
- Would it be helpful to also add in the fare zone?
- I don't personally think so; while it's standard in the infobox, it doesn't seem particularly relevant in the prose.
History:
- Link Revere, Massachusetts
Done
- Consider linking Main line (railway)
Done
- Why is East Everett bolded?
- It's the target of a redirect that's likely to see use - see MOS:BOLDREDIRECT
Comment: I couldn't find which redirect you referred to so I created East Everett station.
- Thanks! I've added a few categories to the redirect. On the technical side, Adjacent stations modules (Module:Adjacent stations/Boston and Maine Railroad in this case) also can act as redirects.
- It's the target of a redirect that's likely to see use - see MOS:BOLDREDIRECT
- Clarify where Boston and 2nd is in relation to the location of the current station (since there is no context for why a different station in another place is being discussed)
Done
- "began studying an extension of" - consider changing to "began studying a proposed extension of"?
Done
- Is there any more information on the "existing Chelsea station"? I assume this is not the same as the East Everett station so it should probably be talked about (or clarified if it was in a completely different location)
- It's discussed and wikilinked in the previous paragraph.
- " with the commuter rail platforms at Bellingham Square closed at that time" - is there any reason for this?
- As discussed in the paragraph beginning
On October 30, 2013
, the platforms at this Chelsea station were a direct replacement for those at Bellingham Square (which, confusingly, was formerly called Chelsea.) I'm open to any copyediting suggestions.Comment: Maybe it would help if it read "original commuter rail platforms at the site of Bellingham Square station"? Not really sure.
- How does this look?
- As discussed in the paragraph beginning
That's all, again a nice article. @Pi.1415926535: Placing on hold. eviolite (talk) 06:22, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Eviolite: Thanks for the review! I've left my comments above - I implemented most of your suggestions, and I'm open to potential copyediting for the last few paragraphs. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:04, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Thanks, responded inline with
Comment:s. eviolite (talk) 13:44, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Eviolite: Replies are above. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- Everything looks good, happy to pass. Great work again, Pi.1415926535. eviolite (talk) 01:55, 11 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Eviolite: Replies are above. Cheers, Pi.1415926535 (talk) 21:52, 10 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Pi.1415926535: Thanks, responded inline with