Talk:Charles Zembillas

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Video games Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants)
Red Barrels (2 participants)
The Campaign Trail (Web Game) (23 participants)
Paper doll (video games) (5 participants)
TheoTown (10 participants; relisted)
Old Grandma Hardcore (6 participants; relisted)
WePlay AniMajor (2 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because I feel it has a significant importance in the creation of the critically acclaimed and commercially successful video game Jak and Daxter: The Precursor Legacy. I have added three references to both Charles' official blog on Blogspot, and to his official gallery hub on The Animation Academy. If the reference formatting is incorrect for Wikipedia I would surely appreciate it if someone were to correct those, but I feel the URLs I provided are in fact reliable sources. I will continue editing the page and adding new sources as I find them; I hope I can keep the page alive. Thanks! --Jacedc (talk) 01:55, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Please add reliable, independent, 3rd party sources. Primary sources such as blogs and subject's web site are not sufficient to assert notability. See: WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:BIO for more information. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 10:32, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Citation 1 references a Blogger profile (not an actual blog, therefore not subject to change.) If it does, I have the Google page cache index for backup, but there are parameters in the url which break the reference template, so I used the actual URL (I'll provide it if need be.) Citation 2 and citation 3 reference actual books (from Google Books.) Should be acceptable? If not, please tell me and I'll fix them. I also used the cite web and cite book templates instead of raw ref tags, so the formatting should be good as well. --Jacedc (talk) 15:02, 29 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

4 November 2013

Inquiring about the "lead missing" template when it clearly has an introduction. I will remove the tag if I do not get a response within the next three days. --Jacedc (talk) 16:50, 4 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]