Talk:Carol Sente
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Poor shape of the article
I came to this article to find way to source the list of communities included in legislative districts in IL (since such a list appears here, but not at the sites of other such legislators). I found this list material unsourced here.
In addition, there is a paucity of material, and all that does appear is redundant with regard to the candidate's *.gov pages, and apparently all derived from there (i.e., without any additional real citations). The one citation appearing, to the (Illinois) State Journal-Register online, is a dead link.
In short, there is a paucity of information, and what does appear is unsourced. The outside links are of limited or no value, as they are essentially all (apart from the VoteSmart, and even there to an extent), presenting information provided by the article subject, or her staff.
Hence, tags were added after finding that even the 1 citn appearing was unverifiable. Because this one reference is a dead link, the BLP tag appears as "unreferenced" rather than "refimprove".
71.239.87.100 (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
- Tags now of the "refimprove" type, since 3 citations added. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 17:35, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
Scorecard score and references added
I added this as a reference to begin the process of describing Sente's voting positions.
It is of interest because it highlights the complexities of such scoring: it is a conservative scorecard (its ten highest scores are to Republicans, its ten lowest to Democrats) that gives this legislator an unusually positive rating for a Democrat.
Much more well-cited info is needed -- as it stands, this scorecard, as the only information on her voting record, is not fully representative (as no single bit of news information can be).
But it is a start, and will make most sense as it appears as a part of an expanding description of votes and policy positions (i.e., sourced specifics on her opinions and voting record).
It also increases valid sourcing at the article by an infinite proportion. as there was, prior, no verifiable source whatsoever (only appearing source, no.1, being broken and irreparable).
71.239.87.100 (talk) 17:31, 18 September 2014 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Carol Sente. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090923234555/http://thedome.sj-r.com:80/section/top-stories/carol-sente-sworn-in-as-new-59th-district-state-representative/ to http://thedome.sj-r.com/section/top-stories/carol-sente-sworn-in-as-new-59th-district-state-representative/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 12:00, 29 January 2016 (UTC)