Talk:Cack

{{editprotected}} This redirect to Wiktionary is currently broken. I believe changing the template to: {{wi|cack}} should do the trick and make this point the right place. Cool3 (talk) 15:29, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Add {{pp-protected}} and remove all those unnecessary dots in the source. Qwertyxp2000 (talk | contribs) 23:07, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Done Sarah-Jane (talk) 15:25, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.

Replace existing long comment with {{Short pages monitor}}<!-- This long comment was added to the page to prevent it from being listed on Special:Shortpages. It and the accompanying monitoring template were generated via Template:Long comment. Please do not remove the monitoring template without removing this comment as well.--> so that this page can become a monitored short page. Michaelwallace22 (talk) 07:28, 7 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Done. @B: it's been 14 years; how do you feel about downgrading the protection here to semi or removing entirely? — The Earwig (talk) 03:05, 14 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@The Earwig: I agree about at least lowering the level of protection. "Cack" has almost 7,000 hits on GScholar, so I think someone might want to turn this page into a legitimate article someday, and they ought to be free to do so. Would you mind doing the honors, or should I make a request at RFPP? Levivich 17:49, 15 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Levivich! What a throwback. Given the lack of objection by B above, I've dropped protection to semi. — The Earwig (talk) 05:23, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks EW! Levivich 15:39, 16 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]