Talk:Cédric Pioline
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
WikiProject class rating
This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 02:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Discussion concerning this article
A discussion that may affect the name or title of this article is ongoing here. Please voice any opinions or concerns on that page. After the discussion concludes, this article may be moved to a different title, in accordance with Wikipedia's Naming Conventions. Thank you. Tennis expert (talk) 18:54, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
A very lengthy discussion has taken place at now archived WP:Requested moves/Tennis regarding the use of diacritics in the titles of tennis-related articles. The result of the requested multiple moves was to keep the articles as they are now, using diacritics, and therefore this move is in keeping with other articles of a similar nature. Additionally, English sources do sometimes manage to get it right, and I have found several English sources which present his name with the acute accent in place, including The Guardian, other encyclopaedias, athletics statistics sites, Yahoo, etc. Maedin\talk 17:01, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- As this was listed at WP:RM for over a week and no opposition to the move was voiced, I have completed the move. Maedin\talk 18:37, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
Inviting Tennis expert to put his case
I'd be most grateful if Tennis expert were to put a convincing case that some consensus exists in a corner of WP that holds back this and other tennis-related articles from moving with the times; specifically, WRT their updating to the now widely accepted change in the treatment of dates, per the central guideline for dates and numbers, MOSNUM. I do not believe that such an outlying consensus exists; but if it did, I'd like to know why the centralised consensus for the whole project does not override this. Tony (talk) 09:54, 18 October 2008 (UTC)