Talk:BrettspielWelt

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Websites Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by WikiProject Websites. An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article. Board and table games Mid‑importance This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

• I'm thinking that this should be removed. The most notable games are already mentioned earlier in the article.Chunky Rice 18:53, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There was a feature article about BSW in Games Magazine in the February 2004 issue. Unfortunately, I don't archive my Games Magazines after I've done the puzzles. Does anybody have any information about this article?Chunky Rice 18:53, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Puerto Rico should probably be removed from the list since it is no longer available on BSW. Alea sold the electronic rights to the game, so it had to be removed. Rdore 21:47, 9 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The image of the games list in BSW is pretty ancient... the newer design is significantly different. Anyone feel like getting a screenshot? -- dcclark (talk) 02:04, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on BrettspielWelt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110722174246/http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/winners-2004.php to http://www.webbyawards.com/webbys/winners-2004.php

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:57, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chrome (as of version 45) and Firefox (as of version 52) no longer support an embedded Java environment for online Java applications. For Firefox, there is a work-around to re-enable it which will be blocked in version 53, and even the long-term support release will remove this feature within two years.
This seems to have a huge impact on Java-heavy sites, and outright kill BSW unless they port _everything_ to another language -- which seems insurmountable given the amount of work and their (lack of?) business model.
So what's the verdict? Will BSW just die within the next two years, or has anyone heard of their plans for this future? As far as I can tell, their website hardly even mentions that they use Java in the first place. JanGB (talk) 16:30, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]