Talk:Breonna Taylor/GA1

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Nominator: Nickscoby (talk · contribs) 20:19, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: DeadlyRampage26 (talk · contribs) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am going to start this review. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 00:44, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article is very well written. Spelling and grammar appear to be all correct and the content uses formal and understandable language for readers of the article. I noticed one thing that could be changed when it comes to the placing of photos, which I have now edited. The article has no primary source research, with most of the sources coming from American news sources. The article is also very well sourced given its size. I'm aware it isn't a criteria for GA, but the templates on the page are also informative and used well. The article is broad, but stays focussed on the relevant topic with regards to Taylor, with very informative and well written paragraphs on her university experience etc. The article maintains a Neutral point of view, and simply provides the information in an unbiased format, recognises the areas where two sides may differ. I would say the article is stable. The illustration is in a good quantity in ratio to the length of the article, and has informative and correct captions. I have just modified the layout of the images to better fit what I have seen on other GA articles. I don't think it is very controversial to say that there really isn't a reason not to pass this page. I think a review is supposed to take about 7 days, but I think I am going to pass this if anyone doesn't have a reason otherwise. As far as I can see it matches the criteria. DeadlyRampage26 (talk) 01:09, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]