Talk:Booth Theatre/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: AnonymousPurpose (talk · contribs)
With over 440+ references this article is quite outstanding from it's immense detail, while maintaining a summary like nature and not over expanding.
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- With over 440+ references to all reputable and reliable sites, with about 300+ of them I directly checked and confirmed their validity. This article's ability to stay up to date and have quality information is great.
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Great ability to stay big picture and only zoom into topics when needed.
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutrality is straight forward here, there's no visible 3rd party bias being presented.
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No wars at all in recent history, or on the talk page.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images and media seem to be sourced from the Wikipedia Commons or a reputable site.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Amazing work, I feel you all have done a great job in this to properly make Booth Theatre feel special and documented in it's own way.
- Pass/Fail: