Search results
There is a page named "Talk:Benoit Mandelbrot" on Wikipedia
- Hello fellow Wikipedians, I have just modified one external link on Benoit Mandelbrot. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions...6 KB (870 words) - 23:22, 14 January 2024
- On 16 October 2010, Benoit mandelbrot was linked from Slashdot, a high-traffic website. (Traffic) All prior and subsequent edits to the article are noted...132 bytes (0 words) - 07:50, 18 October 2010
- This subpage contains data about Benoit Mandelbrot which is used by the Wikipedia:WikiProject Mathematics to produce tables of mathematicians. Edit this...93 bytes (49 words) - 01:09, 24 December 2010
- "B" in "Benoît B. Mandelbrot" stands for "Benoît B. Mandelbrot". So... Benoît B. Mandelbrot then becomes "Benoît Benoît B. Mandelbrot Mandelbrot" - and...52 KB (7,161 words) - 23:18, 30 January 2023
- Benoît Mandelbrot: from cauliflowers to cosmic secrets Here is a proposed alternative opening to the lede, that might be better for nonspecialists, and...7 KB (625 words) - 17:23, 10 April 2024
- nephew Benoit Mandelbrot, was to discover the Mandelbrot set...". This seems to be wrong. If you go to the same Wikipedia and read the entry "Mandelbrot set"...778 bytes (94 words) - 05:19, 9 March 2024
- term Mandelbrot set must be reserved for set(s) actually introduced by Benoit Mandelbrot. It is incorrect to call other iterated sets "mandelbrot sets"...81 KB (11,769 words) - 04:34, 2 February 2023
- paragraph does not match the list of "Current Sterling Professors"; Benoit Mandelbrot, for example, appears in the former but not in the latter.-Ashley...1 KB (151 words) - 19:40, 6 July 2024
- villian in this game is called Benoit Manderubrot. There is an article on a real life person called Benoît Mandelbrot. Simple question: are the names...1 KB (108 words) - 16:01, 25 January 2024
- January 2014 (UTC) Here's what Mandelbrot himself had to say about this: http://www.webofstories.com/play/benoit.mandelbrot/86 — Preceding unsigned comment...80 KB (11,786 words) - 00:19, 18 November 2022
- 2d Mandelbrot set. I'd even go as far as saying the formula I'm linking to is the "correct" 3d Mandelbrot formula, but of course Benoit Mandelbrot would...8 KB (1,150 words) - 19:19, 9 March 2024
- consensus to add your image to the Mandelbrot Set page, which is already well loaded with images that Benoit Mandelbrot himself could be expected to endorse...51 KB (8,270 words) - 13:19, 6 February 2024
- 19:08, 6 January 2006 (UTC) (I also posted this question on the Talk:Benoît Mandelbrot page) The formula as originally presented by BBM was z -> z2 - c but...80 KB (12,838 words) - 04:34, 2 February 2023
- (talk) 08:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/art/art-features/8080336/Benoit-Mandelbrot-from-cauliflowers-to-cosmic-secrets.html...8 KB (1,232 words) - 17:08, 9 April 2024
- 190 bytes (0 words) - 04:14, 28 January 2024
- (talk • contribs) 23:56, 2 June 2005 (UTC) Yes, when Benoît Mandelbrot first plotted the Mandelbrot set, he was investigating the values of c for which...22 KB (3,373 words) - 00:48, 12 February 2020
- puzzled by the lack of reference to Benoit Mandelbrot's original research. It is as if the Mathematician Mandelbrot was a irrelevant academic reference...8 KB (1,125 words) - 07:59, 8 May 2021
- whole," a property called self-similarity. The term was coined by Benoît Mandelbrot in 1975 and was derived from the Latin fractus meaning "broken" or...73 KB (10,452 words) - 04:10, 25 November 2022
- Morphometry and Horton's Laws "How the Finance Gurus Get Risk All Wrong" by Benoit Mandelbrot & Nassim Nicholas Taleb. Fortune, July 11, 2005. "Million-dollar Murray":...24 KB (3,428 words) - 15:45, 12 January 2019
- general form is: f(z) = z^2 + c This can graph the Mandelbrot set, named after Benoit B. Mandelbrot, (born 1924), who first used a computer to graph these...35 KB (5,523 words) - 22:00, 31 January 2023
- This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Benoît Mandelbrot page. Please sign and date your posts using four tildes (~~~~). New discussion