Talk:Battle of Alsasua
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Battle of Alsasua article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | Battle of Alsasua (final version) received a peer review by Wikipedia editors, which on 7 March 2022 was archived. It may contain ideas you can use to improve this article. |
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Battle of Alsasua. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080425135904/http://www.alsasua.net:80/es/lugarygente/historia/curiosidades/ to http://www.alsasua.net/es/lugarygente/historia/curiosidades
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:45, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
Military History Wikiproject assessment, August 2021
@A. C. Santacruz: Thanks for your work on this article. I've assessed the article as not currently meeting B-class criteria B1 (referencing) and B2 (coverage and accuracy). This resulted in a start class assessment. My concern regarding criterion B1 is that the article is dependent on an 1846 source - more recent sources are really needed. My concern regarding criterion B2 is that the background section needs a paragraph or so explaining how this battle fitted into the conflict (material on what the conflict involved would be useful, as it's not well known). Nick-D (talk) 05:25, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback! I'll see what I can do for the referencing A. C. Santacruz (talk) 06:51, 15 August 2021 (UTC)
- Nick-D I have improved the Background section as well as added references from Mark Lawrence's 2014 history of the war. I will continue to add modern sources as I find them (I am forced to look for offline books at major universities in the Netherlands as coverage of the war is extremely rare outside of Spain, and won't get access to these collections until later in the month). If you have any other suggestions or comments I'd appreciate them dearly A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 18:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- @A. C. Santacruz: those changes look good, but I think that material briefly explaining what this war was about and when it started is needed in the background section, so the article can stand on its own feet. Nick-D (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nick-D I have added some material to the Background section. Sorry for the long delay, I was distracted by other areas of WP and work. Santacruz ⁂ Please ping me! 12:13, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
- @A. C. Santacruz: those changes look good, but I think that material briefly explaining what this war was about and when it started is needed in the background section, so the article can stand on its own feet. Nick-D (talk) 22:38, 4 September 2021 (UTC)
- Nick-D I have improved the Background section as well as added references from Mark Lawrence's 2014 history of the war. I will continue to add modern sources as I find them (I am forced to look for offline books at major universities in the Netherlands as coverage of the war is extremely rare outside of Spain, and won't get access to these collections until later in the month). If you have any other suggestions or comments I'd appreciate them dearly A. C. Santacruz ⁂ Talk 18:32, 4 September 2021 (UTC)