Talk:Authenticity of the Testimonium Flavianum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please give reasons

Please give reasons why scholars do not believe the Testimonium Flavianum to be authentic, rather than saying they are all mistaken. Lung salad (talk) 21:20, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

There are two pretty long sections (not written by me) that give pro and con discussions. Those are some of the reasons on either sides - obviously. History2007 (talk) 00:34, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I have seen how it's been written. [1]Lung salad (talk) 09:36, 25 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You might want to actually look at how the article is being written Lung rather than simply trying to project into the article as it lists for and [[2]] the authenticity. Considering this that the Josephus on Jesus article also has a portion in which the authenticity is pointedly disputed and their are arguments found here that are not in that, I think it might be worthwhile to discuss a merger rather than simply trying to dispute the neutrality of the article. Reason and Logic shall always prevail (talk) 23:43, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
FYI: User Lung salad was indef-blocked. History2007 (talk) 00:06, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Authenticity_of_the_Testimonium_Flavianum&oldid=1233763310"