Talk:Artemis Fowl: The Time Paradox/Archive 1
![]() | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 |
References
The first chapter can be found at artemisfowl.com
An excerpt can be found at artemisfowl.co.uk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.234.27.102 (talk) 23:56, 8 July 2008 (UTC)
- I don't think there's any evidence that the chapter given is the actual first chapter. Best to wait until July 15, when it comes out in the USA. That's only a week away. Calvin 1998 (t-c) 00:11, 9 July 2008 (UTC)
Messing with the page
Somebody has read the book and is editing the information, and someone else is changing it back to the original, slightly less uninformed version. This is annoying to users. I'm trying to fix it now (I've read the book.)
Thanks. Also, please sign your posts by typing four tildes, which look like ~~~~. Cheers, IceUnshattered (talk) 21:58, 16 July 2008 (UTC)
Aretmis' Siblings' Names
According to AFC Eoin Colfer said that the names will be Beckett and Myles. he said it might be Jonathan and Finian
My theroy
Does Kronski sound familar? Vaguely? How about Kronski Hotel? Read in the forth book, Artemis Fowl stayed at the Kronski Hotel. Since Kronski has managed to have or own a hotel named after him, He must be rich, possibly after Artemis Fowl's fortune. If anyone wishes to contact me, it is utah_forever1@yahoo.com . 71.30.136.168 (talk) 01:24, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- I think he did. But since that has nothing to do with the plotline as far as we know, we can't say anything about it until the book is released and a full plot synopsis can be written. IceUnshattered (talk) 23:17, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
The name is purely one of coincidence Gordonlocke (talk) 21:25, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
Ending of All Time??
I saw an article , exactly the same as this one that said the title of book 6 was Artemis Fowl: The Ending of All Time. Is this true? Vandalism? A fan title? Could someone please help?
First off, don't forget to sign your name. There is an identical page with that name. It is also mentioned on the Artemis Fowl (series) page but is not changed in the Artemis Fowl template. It is very weird -144.132.24.90 09:57, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
I think the copycat article should be deleted. -007bond 11:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
There are no confirmed title at the moment, but personally, i think "the ending of all time" is too corny for Colfer -_- --0ParadinCLaim0-- 00:00, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, big ditto there. -007bond aka Matthew G aka codingmasters 13:19, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
If time ended then there will be no more artimist fowl books so how can the be right. I also agree with 0ParadinCLaim0 it is too corny.--70.23.25.234 01:42, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Eh, 70.23.35.234, please use correct spelling. I'd also like to comment that even if it was called "The ending of all time", that's not reliable evidence that time's going to end. IceUnshattered (talk) 17:52, 11 May 2008 (UTC)
Unresolved plot details
Be fair now! Can we please give some hope to the people viewing this who believe Artemis and Holly will end up together? It's not like it's impossible, or even ridiculously unlikely. So lets add another plot thingy about possibly Artemis and Holly, yes? Tomheaton17 22:08, 2 December 2007 (UTC)
- No information about that has been given, so until the book comes out and proves that Artemis will marry Holly (which I highly doubt will happen), we can't. C Teng (talk) 01:39, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
Then tell me why we can suggest that Artemis and Minerva will get together when what you just said applies in exactly the same way to that also? Tomheaton17 (talk) 21:13, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? There's nothing about them being together on the article. If there was, its since been removed.--CyberGhostface (talk) 21:43, 29 February 2008 (UTC)
Yeah, the whole 'unresolved plot details' has been removed. Tomheaton17 (talk) 14:23, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Minerva didn't even appear in this book. You were actually kind of right, Tomheaton. → C Teng [talk] 13:33, 31 July 2008 (UTC)