Talk:American logistics in the Normandy campaign
Appearance
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the American logistics in the Normandy campaign article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | American logistics in the Normandy campaign is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so. | |||||||||||||||||||||
![]() | This article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on July 24, 2023. | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article is rated FA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Given the quality and content, could (should?) this, and the article on British logistics, be added to the Normandy campaignbox, or a navbox? GraemeLeggett (talk) 13:14, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- They are already in Template:Campaignbox Normandy. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:52, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- I see it now. I realise that i didnt spot it because it didn't show up as bold in the navbox. ('Should have gone to Barnard Castle').GraemeLeggett (talk) 20:24, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
"Central Base Section"
Why is there the (incomplete) sentence "Central Base Section" (without any meaning inserted here) at the end of the paragraph "Background"? JackkBrown (talk) 23:09, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
- Ask User:Jnestorius, who added it in December 2021 and is still active. Clarityfiend (talk) 02:53, 7 June 2023 (UTC)
- Rubble from rearranging a draft of my edit. I ought to have removed but overlooked it. jnestorius(talk) 08:32, 7 June 2023 (UTC)