Talk:Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure
Appearance
![]() | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Reception
An editor using a dynamic IP address seems to believe that "Alpha and Omega 2: A Howl-iday Adventure received mixed reviews from critics." The rest of the section contradicts this
Two sources are given in the section:
- "so thin and uninteresting, and so lacking in holiday spirit, that you're not going to be pulling this one out each year when the holidays roll around" and that the movie's price combined with its film length made other film choices "even more attractive."
- 1 out of 5 stars and wrote that the "Faux holiday-themed sequel is weak and forgettable."
That is entirely negative. Calling this "mixed" is WP:POV and wrong at the same time.
As the editor in question has made this claim repeatedly under various IPs, ignoring talk requests/edit summaries and making similarly unsourced POV statements in other articles, we might need edit protection and/or a range block on the IPs involved. - SummerPhD (talk) 01:10, 14 December 2014 (UTC)