Talk:Aemilia Tertia
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
I have a query about some of the categories used for "Aemilia Tertia", the article. While I recognize her importance, I am not sure the categories used for her husband Scipio Africanus should also be used here.
For example, Second Punic War commanders | Ancient Roman generals| Roman Republican consuls
We do not have categories like this for the entries on women in Imperial Rome such as Livia, nor for the article Aemilia's better-known daughter Cornelia Africana, i.e. by putting the categories for the husband (or son) for the woman concerned.
In short, request to delete those three categories from the article.
wikibiohistory 05:08, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Aemilia Tertia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070928162041/http://www.fenrir.dk/history/index.php?title=Scipio_Africanus_:_References to http://www.fenrir.dk/history/index.php?title=Scipio_Africanus_:_References
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
DC page review
@Iazyges: Having stumbled on the gaping hole that apparently is the Doug Coldwell incident, I noticed that this was one article that was created there and according to the statistics still contains large amounts of DC content. I'm pinging because I'm not sure who to ask. Are there any tools that identify who added what in the article? Is there any way to cross-reference articles tagged WP:CGR with DC-heavy articles? Ifly6 (talk) 06:43, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- If you look at the history of the article, DC wrote pretty much everything. It's a case of WP:BLOWITUP T8612 (talk) 07:46, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Note: the reference to this strange sentence "Aemilia was gentle, mild-mannered, but also fiercely loyal to her husband" is suspect. There is no mention of her in Scullard's Scipio Africanus, "p. ii", which should normally be the blank page that follows the cover... T8612 (talk) 07:53, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should stubify the article in the first instance? Ifly6 (talk) 14:13, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ifly6: There is a tool called MW:WhoWroteThat that we might usually use (but doesn't seem to be working for me currently?), which would highlight the bits he wrote; however, it will not highlight things he wrote that were lightly modified by someone else. In this case, a huge percentage of the article is his, going back 16 years... I would strongly recommend nuking the article. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @T8612 and Iazyges: I will drop in this replacement draft I put together this morning later today if there are no objections. Ifly6 (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Thanks! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Done. Ifly6 (talk) 17:15, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- Looks good to me. Thanks! Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:56, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @T8612 and Iazyges: I will drop in this replacement draft I put together this morning later today if there are no objections. Ifly6 (talk) 16:40, 28 April 2023 (UTC)
- @Ifly6: There is a tool called MW:WhoWroteThat that we might usually use (but doesn't seem to be working for me currently?), which would highlight the bits he wrote; however, it will not highlight things he wrote that were lightly modified by someone else. In this case, a huge percentage of the article is his, going back 16 years... I would strongly recommend nuking the article. Iazyges Consermonor Opus meum 16:37, 28 April 2023 (UTC)