Talk:Adelaide Festival Centre
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Adelaide Festival Centre article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Adelaide Festival Centre. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061118210054/http://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/sections/about_the_house/house_history/timeline/timeline_interiors.html to http://www.sydneyoperahouse.com/sections/about_the_house/house_history/timeline/timeline_interiors.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:18, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
"The much-maligned Festival Plaza"
Hey, so I've actually never commented on a wikipedia page before, but I really love the old Festival Plaza design, and I was looking up pictures of it just now and was really surprised at how negative this page is about it. I guess the author is not a fan, which is fair enough, but it had its supporters! Public art can be a bit divisive like that I guess.
Because the old plaza has been demolished and a new one is currently being built, it's getting pretty hard to actually find any information about it now - searching for "Adelaide Festival Plaza" mostly just brings up government plans about the new site. I am not a writer, but I think it would be worth having a separate article or at least section on this page about the old plaza and would love to encourage that.
Here's an interesting article from a local paper: https://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/removal-of-hajeks-sculptures-from-adelaide-festival-centre-plaza-grows-more-likely/news-story/815c57e664f3ff003015f61ea235e0bb
And here's one from an art magazine I found online: https://www.artlink.com.au/articles/4113/the-vandalisation-of-art-28de29commissioning-art-in-/
Here's a good picture from a postcard: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/City-Sign-Olga-Lodge-Fountain-and-Southern-Plaza-Adelaide-Festival-Centre-Adelaide_fig7_267098823 (Unsigned, TerryCavanagh, 15 April 2021)
- TerryCavanagh, I have updated the section considerably and have added a redirect to the Construction section. (Making a separate section doesn't really fit into the chronological history very well, plus the various parts of the plaza have been named different things by different sources at different times.) Btw "much-maligned" kind of implies that the owner of the opinion doesn't agree with the maligning, but I have taken out that wording anyway. The wording did not, or should not, reflect the opinion of the editor, but the sources - every opinion is cited. Pretty much all sources say that opinions differed widely, so this is reflected in the article still, but I have also added some of the praise and positive opinions. (Then got sidetracked into the architects.) Also btw, even if you are not a registered editor, you are welcome to contribute to talk pages, but please remember to sign your name using 4 tildes (~), which automatically shows IP address, date and time. Laterthanyouthink (talk) 11:03, 16 April 2021 (UTC)