Talk:Achillius of Larissa
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Fairly notable, if you ask me
I don't think that Achillius warrants deletion. There are literally hundreds, maybe thousands, of only semi-notable saints articles on Wikipedia, and I would maintain that this one has more potential than most. I'm going to try to add to the article enough to justify its inclusion. Alekjds TALK 20:32, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for expanding. I agree about the number of semi-notable and non-notable saints (many of whom are not longer observed by any major liturgical calendar). The expansion certainly addresses the concerns I had -- in fact, just a little bit more info and I would remove the stub tag if I were you. Pastordavid 21:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I'm going to add an infobox and then unstub it.
I think the issue with some of these saints is that the most authoritative resources, such as Catholic Encyclopedia and online hagiographies like Catholic Forum and Catholic Online (although C. Online did include a profile for Achillius), is that they're very decidedly Roman. They may make passing references to Orthodox saints, but nothing as complete as the resources that exist for Western saints. I guess one could extrapolate that the underlying issue is the sheer organizational impact of having so many "Eastern Churches" as compared to the bureaucratized Western Church - that being irrelevant to the discussion, of course. Alekjds TALK 21:36, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
- My reply is on your talk page Pastordavid 22:46, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
St. Achillius' island is within Greece's borders (it is in the Florina prefecture), I have therefore corrected it one the table on the right. 79.103.136.201 (talk) 11:52, 10 October 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Achillius of Larissa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071019105105/http://www.pomog.org/prologue/May/28.htm to http://www.pomog.org/prologue/May/28.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070203093922/http://www.culture.gr:80/2/21/212/21211n/e212kn08.html to http://www.culture.gr/2/21/212/21211n/e212kn08.html
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929103000/http://www.ditikimakedonia-region.com/en_contents.asp?category=109&id=138Saint to http://www.ditikimakedonia-region.com/en_contents.asp?category=109&id=138Saint
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100713164702/http://www.katolsk.no:80/biografi/alarissa.htm to http://www.katolsk.no/biografi/alarissa.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 3 October 2016 (UTC)