Search results
Appearance
There is a page named "Talk:Abia (mythology)" on Wikipedia
- WikiProject page for more details.MythologyWikipedia:WikiProject MythologyTemplate:WikiProject MythologyMythology articles Low This article has been...274 bytes (0 words) - 04:21, 7 February 2024
- need improvement! -- Cayzle I've moved this page from Islamic Mythology to Arabic mythology, not because I consider them the same but because they are clearly...36 KB (5,417 words) - 03:28, 8 April 2024
- Minority? The Igbo people of Nigeria are an Ethnic group; if I moved to say Abia State/my descendants lived there for generations, would I/they be considered...13 KB (1,843 words) - 23:21, 3 April 2024
- scholarship. I presented more arguments about such allegations of "bias" at WP:ABIAS. Wikipedia does have a "bias" for mainstream science, but that does not...96 KB (14,977 words) - 02:11, 2 March 2023
- Also, we are heavily biased for the academia/mainstream science, see WP:ABIAS and WP:ARBPS. Tgeorgescu (talk) 14:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC) I put in this...143 KB (20,848 words) - 13:30, 25 May 2024
- Talk:Ascension of Jesus (category B-Class Mythology articles)biased for the mainstream academia, I wrote an essay thereupon, see WP:ABIAS. tgeorgescu (talk) 21:01, 18 May 2023 (UTC) Thank you for the information...27 KB (3,853 words) - 02:13, 12 March 2024
- Talk:Genesis flood narrative/Archive 1 (section Please add information on intercultural flood mythology and theories on postglacial global sea level rise)true that Wikipedia is not "anti-creationist", but it's "pro-academic" (WP:ABIAS). Geology demonstrated that there never was a flood of those proportions...201 KB (29,241 words) - 19:25, 7 May 2024
- being quoted. ReformedArsenal (talk) 13:32, 16 October 2013 (UTC) See WP:ABIAS. Tgeorgescu (talk) 17:35, 16 October 2013 (UTC) Ha! A "disinterested community...250 KB (39,436 words) - 23:25, 1 March 2023
- Wikipedia's own view, it is no violation of a neutral point of view, see WP:ABIAS for detalis. Tgeorgescu (talk) 21:27, 17 April 2014 (UTC) As an oriental...136 KB (16,903 words) - 03:52, 3 October 2015
- (talk) 18:59, 11 May 2020 (UTC) Wikipedia deals in historical facts, not mythology. --Khajidha (talk) 20:08, 11 May 2020 (UTC) It is a historical fact that...252 KB (32,252 words) - 23:41, 10 August 2024
- Herodot a scris despre geti si nu despre daci, care au aparut in izvoare abia dupa patru secole?" (see also his reaction to the "Traco-Geto-Daci" denominator...106 KB (16,907 words) - 15:04, 12 March 2024
- practice in any other historical articles about the Ancient world. Per WP:ABIAS Wikipedia has to render the present-day academic consensus, not the consensus...429 KB (67,075 words) - 15:58, 15 May 2022
- noticed, WP:CHOPSY is neither policy or a guideline. It is in fact part of WP:ABIAS, an essay created by Tgeorgescu. Jerm (talk) 00:50, 26 April 2020 (UTC)...189 KB (29,158 words) - 02:34, 15 September 2020
- TheNewSaadia (talk • contribs) 17:03, 8 November 2014 (UTC) See WP:RNPOV and WP:ABIAS. In respect to historical events, mainstream historians make the call, this...167 KB (23,940 words) - 21:18, 21 July 2024
- encyclopedia, WP:FRINGE/PS, WP:GEVAL, Wikipedia:Lunatic charlatans and WP:ABIAS. So, to some extent the article renders a debate between opposite views...199 KB (27,323 words) - 07:44, 15 January 2022
- (UTC) @Vaxorian: I say just take time to read WP:NOTNEUTRAL, WP:FIXBIAS, WP:ABIAS and WP:NOBIGOTS. Your conception of neutrality isn't ours (meaning: it does...97 KB (13,716 words) - 00:04, 5 July 2023
- mainstream. If you don't like doing that, you won't like it here. See WP:ABIAS. Since you cited Densusianu and Iosif Constantin Dragan as if they wrote...413 KB (24,316 words) - 01:00, 16 March 2023
- and Wikipedia does not have a problem with that. You may want to read WP:ABIAS for more information. Besides, it would be impossible to deny that the cult...213 KB (33,565 words) - 20:52, 18 January 2014