Talk:2006 Kamchatka earthquake

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Earthquakes Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Earthquakes, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of earthquakes, seismology, plate tectonics, and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EarthquakesWikipedia:WikiProject EarthquakesTemplate:Banner/ EarthquakesWikiProject Earthquakes articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Geology Low‑importance Talk:2006 Kamchatka earthquake is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:Banner/ GeologyGeology articles Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Russia: History / Physical geography Stub‑class Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:Banner/ RussiaRussia articles Stub This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible. Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. This article is supported by the history of Russia task force. This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

There doesn't seem to be any good reason for the title to be plural - there was an M7.6 mainshock and many aftershocks, three of which were M≥6 - nothing unusual about that. I will move the article to the singular title for that reason, matching scientific papers on the topic. Mikenorton (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]