Talk:165 (number)

	This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
Numbers This article is within the scope of WikiProject Numbers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Numbers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NumbersWikipedia:WikiProject NumbersTemplate:WikiProject NumbersNumbers articles

Why on earth does this redirect to 160 (number) without any explanation? This is just wierd. – b_jonas 15:32, 15 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Neither of those entries is at all notable.

• One doesn't say it's a record.
• The second is, at best, a team record.
• And neither has a source. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 04:07, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Personally, I think that none of the "in sports" sections in number pages are relevant to the number itself. Dhrm77 (talk) 12:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I removed them. Some records could be notable if referenced, and if important to the sport in some way, however these do not seem to be exceptional. Radlrb (talk) 18:04, 21 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]