Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/New page reviewer

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Rosguill (talk | contribs) at 02:06, 13 March 2020 (→‎User:Berrely: done (using userRightsManager)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

New page reviewer

User:Vivek ji123

[sigh...] I'm requesting this as I'm long-time trustworthy editor that doesn't want to lose the right to be able to see the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" link, as I occasionally "manually" patrol new pages in the course of my editing. Let me be clear – I have no intention of becoming a New Page Patrol "regular" (I do sometimes check the New Pages list, but not very often...), nor do I intend to use Page Curation. But we shouldn't be removing the ability to "spot-check" new articles from long-time regular editors, esp. those of us who occasionally come across new articles as part of our work for various WikiProjects (e.g. I sometimes come across new articles as part of WP:TV or WP:FILMBIO or even WP:TRAINS editing...). Anyway, I meet the qualification criteria, and I understand the "[Mark this page as patrolled]" link will soon be disappearing for the rest of us, so I'll go ahead and request this now. --Vivek ji123 09:46, 06 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done Sorry, your track record of article creation and lack of participation in deletion discussions do not suggest that you are sufficiently familiar with notability guidelines to receive the new page reviewer permission at this time.
As a side note, I'm afraid that I can't find a track record of you having marked any pages as patrolled, could you point me at an example of one? signed, Rosguill talk 04:52, 6 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pbritti

Hi, I'm User:Pbritti and I'd love to help with the influx of articles being added to English Wikipedia. I've looking at a lot of the various "behind-the-scenes" conversations many users are having regarding the high rate of article creation. I have recently published several articles that have been stuck in the purgatory of being unreviewed. While I know I can't do much about those, I would love to help others avoid that bothersome uncertainty of whether their article will be accepted. Wikipedia is a wonderful resource and if there's a way to expand it while avoiding adding those articles created for malicious and commercial purposes, I'm here to help. Thanks! Pbritti (talk) 19:58, 11 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:Berrely

Hi there, I've participated in multiple WP:AFD discussions and show a clear understanding of guidelines. I would like to review new articles as I have noticed there are not nearly enough reviewers and I would like to help. BᴇʀʀᴇʟʏTalk to meWhat have I been doing 20:27, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user has 480 edits in the mainspace. MusikBot talk 20:30, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for two weeks, try to do at least 10-20 reviews in that time. signed, Rosguill talk 02:06, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

User:PK650

Hi! User:Barkeep49 kindly trusted me with a 30 day reviewing trial a while back, and if I'm not mistaken that period culminated today. Would love to know if my brief experience lived up to the task, and if so I would be very happy to continue learning and hopefully improving the encyclopedia as a whole! Thank you, PK650 (talk) 01:59, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]
 Automated comment This user was granted temporary new page reviewer rights by Barkeep49 (expires 15:28, 13 March 2020 (UTC)). MusikBot talk 02:00, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]