Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Frayae (talk | contribs) at 20:48, 21 July 2018 (→‎Technical requests). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Edit this section if you want to move a request from Uncontroversial to Contested.

Uncontroversial technical requests

Contested technical requests

How is it any different than, e.g., an intentional tort? 142.160.89.97 (talk) 19:48, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is not very different. It would be unusual to refer to a Dignitary tort in the singular, but it is common to refer to an intentional tort in the singular. Because a tort within the category of intentional torts is a tort done with intent. Thus it is descriptive to use 'intentional tort' to describe it, legal sources use both 'intentional tort' and 'intentional torts'. But it is less common to use the singular 'Dignitary tort' as it is more descriptive to instead use the tort one is referring to. Legal sources use the plural far more commonly, although the singular is occasionally used, copying in the main from a 1988 paper which used it thus. Perhaps intentional tort should be moved to intentional torts. Certainly the plural is used by all major works I have checked. But it is not a pressing concern for it to be changed. — Frayæ (Talk/Spjall) 20:47, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves