Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
![]() | If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Bolt action → Bolt-action (currently a redirect back to Bolt action) (move · discuss) – "Bolt-action", with a hyphen, is the correct form. RadiculousJ (talk) 14:04, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- Pump action → Pump-action (currently a redirect back to Pump action) (move · discuss) – "Pump-action", with a hyphen, is the correct form. RadiculousJ (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
Contested technical requests
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
"Narrow gauge" hyphen dispute
- Narrow gauge railways in Albania (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Albania) → Narrow-gauge railways in Albania (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Serbia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Serbia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Serbia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Turkey (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Turkey) → Narrow-gauge railways in Turkey (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Slovenia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Slovenia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Slovenia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Sweden (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Sweden) → Narrow-gauge railways in Sweden (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Ukraine (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Ukraine) → Narrow-gauge railways in Ukraine (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Spain (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Spain) → Narrow-gauge railways in Spain (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Russia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Russia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Russia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Poland (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Poland) → Narrow-gauge railways in Poland (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Norway (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Norway) → Narrow-gauge railways in Norway (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Luxembourg (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Luxembourg) → Narrow-gauge railways in Luxembourg (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Lithuania (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Lithuania) → Narrow-gauge railways in Lithuania (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Latvia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Latvia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Latvia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Kazakhstan (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Kazakhstan) → Narrow-gauge railways in Kazakhstan (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Hungary (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Hungary) → Narrow-gauge railways in Hungary (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Finland (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Finland) → Narrow-gauge railways in Finland (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Estonia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Estonia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Estonia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Denmark (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Denmark) → Narrow-gauge railways in Denmark (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Cyprus (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Cyprus) → Narrow-gauge railways in Cyprus (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Croatia (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Croatia) → Narrow-gauge railways in Croatia (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Austria (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Austria) → Narrow-gauge railways in Austria (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Portugal (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Portugal) → Narrow-gauge railways in Portugal (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Italy (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Italy) → Narrow-gauge railways in Italy (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in France (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways of France) → Narrow-gauge railways in France (currently a redirect instead to Narrow-gauge railways of France) (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Bulgaria (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Bulgaria) → Narrow-gauge railways in Bulgaria (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Europe (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Europe) → Narrow-gauge railways in Europe (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in Germany (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in Germany) → Narrow-gauge railways in Germany (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in the Czech Republic (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in the Czech Republic) → Narrow-gauge railways in the Czech Republic (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Narrow gauge railways in the Netherlands (currently a redirect to Narrow-gauge railways in the Netherlands) → Narrow-gauge railways in the Netherlands (move · discuss) – [see below]
- British narrow gauge railways (currently a redirect to British narrow-gauge railways) → British narrow-gauge railways (move · discuss) – [see below]
- List of narrow gauge railways in Ireland (currently a redirect to List of narrow-gauge railways in Ireland) → List of narrow-gauge railways in Ireland (move · discuss) – [see below]
- Septemvri–Dobrinishte narrow gauge line (currently a redirect to Septemvri–Dobrinishte narrow-gauge line) → Septemvri–Dobrinishte narrow-gauge line (move · discuss) –
All moved without discussion by the same user, despite the hyphenation of "narrow-gauge" being the subject of at least two ongoing RMs (here and here, in which that user is participating but which do not appear to be going his way), and previous RMs that have kept/inserted the hyphen (e.g. here), and MOS:HYPHEN which says to hyphenate compound adjectives, and proof that his "it's American" argument is false. This is tendentious, disruptive WP:FAITACCOMPLI abuse of direct moves and should be administratively admonished. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 00:03, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- In what way is this edit-warring escalation a positive move, or in particular a mere "technical request"? Andy Dingley (talk) 00:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- If you have some kind of issue with #Requests to revert undiscussed moves being classified under "Technical requests", where it may not be the best fit, you should take that up at WT:RM. I didn't make it that way, but it is the proper venue for requesting the reversion of undiscussed moves, and I decline to be taken to task for using it for its intended purpose. If you have an issue with that fact that it's disruptive to run around moving a large number of articles, with misleading edit summaries, and the clear intent of spiting the outcome of RMs one isn't getting one's way in – and you'll be going against ArbCom's previous decisions about fait accompli behavior, as well as WP:ANI history in dealing with disruptive move abuse – feel free to propose an exception at WT:Disruptive editing. If you want the community to change the definition of "edit warring" to include using the standardized process for reverting undiscussed moves (rather than just going and reverting them manually) as a form of editwarring, and thus undo the #Requests to revert undiscussed moves process's rationale for existence, that's probably a proposal for WP:Village pump (policy). — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽ʌⱷ҅ᴥⱷʌ≼ 02:17, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- @Andy Dingley, SMcCandlish, Bermicourt, and Dicklyon: Lets get this dispute properly sorted out, before anyone has to move all those 42 articles. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2017 (UTC)
- As uninvolved, I would suggest this course of action. Allow the RM at Narrow gauge railways in Saxony to establish the default for all "narrow gauge" articles. If it passes (the default is hyphen), do all of the above moves without further discussion. Anyone may then open an RM affecting a single article if they feel there is enough basis to vary it from the default. This would require something unusual about that article/situation, not a re-hash of the arguments at Saxony. No further moves would be done in this group without RM. ―Mandruss ☎ 14:56, 27 January 2017 (UTC)