Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
![]() | If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Galápagos NV (currently a redirect to Galapagos NV) → Galapagos NV (move · discuss) – the company itself and all sources write it without the accent on the a Lonaowna (talk) 22:37, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Comment. The destination is salted. — Andy W. (talk) 23:08, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- Reliability, availability and serviceability (computing) (currently a redirect to Reliability, availability and serviceability) → Reliability, availability and serviceability (move · discuss) – The non-parenthetical title is currently unused -- Fyrael (talk) 21:42, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- The page has had a serial comma since 2009. Would Reliability, availability, and serviceability make sense? — Andy W. (talk) 22:26, 3 November 2016 (UTC)
- TimeSplitters (series) (currently a redirect to TimeSplitters) → TimeSplitters (move · discuss) – Series has more than 3 video game articles now per WP:NCVG, set this page to be the primary article. Neverrainy (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- TimeSplitters → TimeSplitters (video game) (move · discuss) – Series has more than 3 video game articles now per WP:NCVG, set this page to be the secondary article. Neverrainy (talk) 00:28, 4 November 2016 (UTC)
- Does the series possess "at least one other unrelated video game or related media item"? I'm not sure. Fuortu (talk) 01:09, 4 November 2016 (UTC)