User talk:IndianBio

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by GagaNutella (talk | contribs) at 21:17, 26 February 2016 (→‎A barnstar for you!: YAS). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

I assume the peer review is a step toward FAC? If not, you should definitely consider. Great work on the article! Good luck. ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yep defeinitely. I'm amazed at the article and how I created it lol. —IB [ Poke ] 16:14, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
👍 Like ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hi IB. This week has been especially busy, but I will try to start looking at your article soon. Thanks for your patience! Moisejp (talk) 04:15, 3 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Moisejp yes please I can understand, real time is always more important. And yes I am patiently waiting for your review hehe :) —IB [ Poke ] 14:36, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Madonna songs page

Hey, you asked me to look at the page and be of some help to which I said yes. But I haven't made a single edit to the article yet 'cause right now I really want to make Gaga's article an FA with you and Snuggums. I surely will get to the list too sometime later. What do you say? -- Frankie talk 21:57, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: hey that's fine I guess, we have to really work hard on Gaga's article, and I'm sure me and Calvin999 can work on the list. You can give your input whenever you get time? —IB [ Poke ] 23:16, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of songs recorded by Madonna has been nominated for Did You Know

Billboard Box Office Scores

Hey matey. As you know I've been out of the loop for a few years now, so do you have any idea when Billboard posts the audiences/grosses for example, MCs holiday shows, her February Vegas leg (then other 2), European leg etc. How long do they usually take or is it once a year? Cheers bro, hope your're well. Ps. Is there any way to get some box office info on her 'Chanteuse Tour'? It was dreadful lol but bitch sold out 5 Chinese stadiums. I wanna see dem reciepts lmaoo ;)--PeterGriffinTalk2Me 18:48, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Petergriffin, as far as I know, they publish the boxscore only when the merchant reports them, like how SoundScan takes the point of sales data. I have never seen Mariah Carey live and this time I am definitely gonna see her, so excited. —IB [ Poke ] 20:46, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Really? :) You going to the O2 show?--PeterGriffinTalk2Me 02:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes yes I am :D. I'm so excited! I'm also seeing Adele :D —IB [ Poke ] 09:30, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
All three of us going to the 02?!  — Calvin999 09:41, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OMG you are going too? :O —IB [ Poke ] 10:00, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lol, why the "oh"?! Yeah I am. I saw her in Vegas last year after waiting 10 years now she's coming to 40 minutes from where I live.  — Calvin999 10:02, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lol I meant I did not know that so the oh :P —IB [ Poke ] 10:03, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Lol. I'm seeing Adele at the 02 the night before as well.  — Calvin999 10:07, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
OMG me too! :O. —IB [ Poke ] 10:14, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Haha what a coincidence! Going to 02 twice in two nights will be a drag but it's worth it lol  — Calvin999 10:17, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm gonna stay in London, can't be bothered to arse back to Crawley. —IB [ Poke ] 10:20, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thought about it but I'm not going to. I'm not going to take a case into the 02 either lol  — Calvin999 10:26, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah me too, can't take my college bag full of books, so gonna leave it at a mates' in Canary. —IB [ Poke ] 10:29, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Don't Cry for Me Argentina

Hi, Indian! How are you =)? I'm working on the version of Madonna's Don't Cry for Me Argentina in the Wikipedia in Spanish and I found that the song peaked at number 3 on RPM's Adult Contemporary Tracks: here. Further, according to Madonna's offcial website, "Don't Cry for Me Argentina" was released on 11 February 1997. Also confirmed by the Discogs page. That's all, friend! I'm so sorry for my English, I don't speak it... yet, jeje. Thanks, Indian! Goodbye, MadonnaFan (talk) 21:06, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for your info MadonnaFan. :) —IB [ Poke ] 21:44, 8 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Reflist-talk

I see, but I think this template is specifically for the purpose of keeping sources on talk pages displayed near the discussion itself, rather than bunching at the bottom of the article, especially since it interrupts the lowest discussion on the talk page. ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:03, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anything is fine, just FYI. —IB [ Poke ] 18:05, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Hi IndianBio it's been awhile since we last chatted. I see you're still active on music related subjects and was wondering if you could help out on the "Heart of Glass" article. I've tried adding a genre to Giselle Bundchen's version of "Heart of Glass" but another editor removed my edit and my ref stating Allmusic was not a good ref. Could you find a reliable source for the genre of Giselle's single? Also if you have the time could you add the track listings for her version of "Heart of Glass"? I believe there is two versions available, a radio edit and a club edit for her single. Thanks. Caden cool 20:43, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Caden, the user is right that AllMusic is unreliable for genres, good for reviews and all though. And I really am busy in my wiki work load so have to decline the request for editing the article. —IB [ Poke ] 09:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Born Thin Way

Hi. You reverted twice my edit (adding [[Category:Songs with feminist themes]]) in Born This Way (song), calling my edit as WP:OR. As I said, the article itself says that 'Ann Powers from Los Angeles Times noted that the video paid tribute to the Goddess movement and feminism', and I just followed this description. However, you said 'The video paid the tribute, not necessarily the song, please don't mix your WP:OR in it', but considering other music articles, I think the content of the video can be (or should be) reflected in the category: please read Numb (Linkin Park song), and it does not necessarily contains themes about bullying, but it is included in [[Category:Songs about bullying]] mainly because of the video. I think your standard of WP:OR is too strict and not very consistent with the previous examples of the music articles. さえぼー (talk) 03:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No it is not my standard but Wikipedia's. Previous examples of music articles also is not important in this discussion, since it concerns with "Born This Way" the song, not a LP song. The article is about the song, where this feminist theme description fails and interpreting it as such using what the video is described is what blatantly fails as WP:OR. Have a good day. —IB [ Poke ] 09:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So, to avoid WP:OR I added several references mentioning the song's feminist or girl-power message and added the category again. I think this time you won't think "this feminist theme description fails" or that I violated WP:OR because I used three appropriate references. And would you please be kind enough to quote the part of WP:OR which discourages us from "using what the video is" to explain the song, following Wikipedia:Please do not bite the newcomers? さえぼー (talk) 02:58, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You'll See

Hello! how are you? I'm currently working on expanding "You'll See", I wanna get that article, one of my favorite Madonna songs, to a good article. I was wondering if you could help me fix up the charts/commercial section, right there before I move it to the actual article's page. Hope to hear your answer! Cheers! --Chrishm21 (talk) 20:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Let me know once you are done, then only I will work on it. The article needs ample amount of work still. —IB [ Poke ] 21:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No problem! I'll finish my sandbox, and translate it to the article and leave it up to you :) Thanks! --Chrishm21 (talk) 22:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
No Chrishm, please don't move it to the mainspace, its really bad in terms of its formatting and references. Let me correct it in the sandbox and then move it. —IB [ Poke ] 23:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure no prob! :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)--Chrishm21 (talk) 03:40, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the help with "You'll See"! Hopefully we'll be able to collaborate in more articles! I wanted to ask if it was okay if I nominate it for GA now.--Chrishm21 (talk) 17:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Chrishm21 I will be glad to collaborate with you, but I have to help two of 11JORN's articles now lol. And I am waiting for the source for one info in the "You'll See" article after that I will nominate it with your name. —IB [ Poke ] 09:52, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The one I'm most interested in nominating is Like a Prayer, from what I did with that one, I think it's practically done, all it needs is some clean up and rearrangement of the content and sources. I would also like to work on Erotica and Bedtime Stories singles. If there's anything I can do to help you or 11JORN, please tell me :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 18:07, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Chrishm21:, done then, after 11JORN's articles I will help you with Like a Prayer, its a great album , although not my favorite. By the way Erotica the album article is already GA, perhaps you meant the song article? —IB [ Poke ] 08:56, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Of course! lol I'm talking about Erotica' singles hahaha :D I would also like to contribute on the remaining Ray of Light songs --Chrishm21 (talk) 15:33, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

TIHTY'S GA

Since November 2015, and no one has taken it. Don't you know someone who could review this article? GagaNutellatalk 01:48, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GagaNutella: lol its best I guess since we have the Oscars and some more info will be added if she wins as well as performs the song. TIHTY has also been climbing AC chart, so it might do something there. —IB [ Poke ] 08:57, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
oh it's true. I still can't believe it topped the dance club chart lmao I asked you because I was worried if there is a deadline to review a GA. Also about the song, do you think we're have any chance at the Grammys and Oscars? I guess we won't win the Grammy, but we'll take home the Oscar! GagaNutellatalk 14:40, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can't say about the Oscars, but you are right about the Grammy. -- Frankie talk 22:31, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Frankie, the Oscars we're gonna win, I'm faith! GagaNutellatalk 22:34, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It already lost to "Glory". Thank god "Bore You Again" did not win again and I hope it loses Song of the Year. Sick and tired of that and "Uptown Funk". —IB [ Poke ] 22:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I hope she and DiCaprio win so that I can see that expression again :D -- Frankie talk 22:36, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now that would be a pop culture moment! —IB [ Poke ] 22:39, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It really sucks that Gaga lost, and I would be sooooooo happy myself if she and DiCaprio win at the Oscars. Snuggums (talk / edits) 23:59, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for List of songs recorded by Madonna

Coffee // have a cup // beans // 00:02, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gwen Stefani!

Hey Cedric! I am very grateful for all of your edits on Wikipedia, especially edits for music articles! Personally, I am very passionate about all things Gwen Stefani and No Doubt. A WikiProject Gwen Stefani has recently been started and is currently on the hunt for new members! Even if you're not familiar with their work, your substantially HIGH level of expertise is very welcome here! WP would appreciate your membership if it works for you, and we look forward to seeing you there! Thanks so much for your time! Cheers! Carbrera (talk) 23:38, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"4 in the Morning" is my favorite song of hers. I might not join, but hook me up whenever you are developing anything from The Sweet Escape era. <3 —IB [ Poke ] 09:48, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a reliable source? It's subscription based so I can't check what's on Secret Love Song.  — Calvin999 10:26, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Extremely reliable. They report on sales directly, I have a UK subscription. —IB [ Poke ] 10:34, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't suppose you can add the source for it's peak of 7 selling 44,000 and total sales of 172,000 please? It's unsourced atm.  — Calvin999 10:40, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Let me search if I get anything with that sales info. —IB [ Poke ] 10:51, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Calvin999, I can't find it in Music Week website. Not sure if the person who added it found it from the print magazine, which I won't have. —IB [ Poke ] 11:47, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's okay don't worry.  — Calvin999 11:52, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


TUTBMP

How are you! :) just to let you know I'm also working on this expansion if you're interested in heloi g me; it's harder tho :S not to many ifnormation regarding the background or critical reception. --Chrishm21 (talk) 22:57, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Chrishm21 do you have Fred Bronson's Billboard book? —IB [ Poke ] 09:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I do not :( --Chrishm21 (talk) 12:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I added some more critical reviews, but I still can't find anything remotely related to the song's origins and backgrounds :( --Chrishm21 (talk) 19:58, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Leave it to me then. —IB [ Poke ] 20:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sure will do!! Let me know how I can help :) --Chrishm21 (talk) 21:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you have removed all of the incoming links to Maverick Records, leaving in the edit summary a justification that the article has been redirected and as such the links are no longer necessary. I see that you have done this for several hundred articles, I presume using some sort of script. However, persons interested in knowing something about Maverick Records can still find relevant information about the label by looking at the article for the parent company (and I'm not entirely sure why it was redirected; was there an AfD about this or something? Maverick's a rather important record label!). So having Maverick Records linked in music articles is still an important arrangement. Can you please undo the link removal using the same script? I don't use any automated tools, and so it would be very cumbersome for me to sit and undo all your edits manually; I don't have that many hours to devote to this over the weekend, and I presume the automation makes the task rather simple. Chubbles (talk) 21:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi IndianBio. Please revert the removal of these wikilinks to Maverick Records. They are valid links according to our guidelines about redirects and wikilinks, and are useful to readers. Thanks very much, Paul Erik (talk)(contribs) 02:56, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Look, it's going to take me a huge amount of time to undo all of this by hand...can't you just fix the links using Twinkle again? Chubbles (talk) 09:07, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No, Twinkle doesnot have it, and if you talk about reverts I will do it in my own time. —IB [ Poke ] 09:54, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I've undone about 40 of them, but there were several hundred, and it would be appreciated if you could do some of the fixing... Chubbles (talk) 21:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

GHV2

Hi again Indian! How are you? I saw that GVH2 peaked at number 8 in Argentina, source provided by CAPIF and Billboard. Good information for the article ;). Thanks, Indian! And sorry again for my English. MadonnaFan (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Will add it now. —IB [ Poke ] 21:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you very much, Indian . It's my pleasure to give everything I can about Madonna. She's my idol. Any information I have, I'll let you know ;). Thanks, Indian. I send you a big hug :). MadonnaFan (talk) 21:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A favor?

I'm here to fulfill your offer from earlier! Yummy (Gwen Stefani song) could use a bit of work, and it is a promotional single from the The Sweet Escape era, so lemme know if you're interested. Thanks! Carbrera (talk) 23:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also, I meant to add "if you're not busy", but thanks anyways. Carbrera (talk) 23:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Since you are an avid editor of Adele-related articles, just wanted to inform you about the GA nomination of "All I Ask". Fell free to make any rectifications you want, pre-review. Thanks.--MaranoFan (talk) 07:34, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I need some neutral editors at [1].--MaranoFan (talk) 01:01, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Sooner or Later (Madonna song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Hurricanehink -- Hurricanehink (talk) 04:40, 22 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Work

Wow, Rihanna just earned her 14th number-one single in the US, surpassing the King of Pop. I am so happy. Do you like the song? -- Frankie talk 07:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC) Frankie talk 07:35, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I love Work, yes, I love the video ,she's so crazy. —IB [ Poke ] 09:53, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I would say, too sexy as well :P. — Tom(T2ME) 11:21, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail

Hello, IndianBio. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Who are you? —IB [ Poke ] 09:56, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
(talk page stalker) 177.133.209.174 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) is from Curitiba, Brazil if that helps IB -- samtar whisper 10:06, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, but why is a random IP sending me mail? And where do I check it? —IB [ Poke ] 10:10, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The email that you provided when you created this account :)  — Calvin999 10:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I checked that, but I did not receive any email :S Confusing and I think I will notify an administrator. —IB [ Poke ] 10:30, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Junk folder? Yeah I would too.  — Calvin999 11:09, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
WAIIIIIT LMAOOO I DID! I'm sorry IB!!! I thought I was logged on my account, I hate when this happens :/ I sent u an email! GagaNutellatalk 15:35, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
GagaNutella LMAO but I still did not get it. —IB [ Poke ] 15:37, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Damn. I will send again. GagaNutellatalk 15:40, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rescue Me - literally

Hi. You reverted my edit of Madonna's "Rescue Me" after I added the UK cover of the single. Your reason for its removal was that 'Extra covers are not allowed unless there are strong rationale behind it'. Is that a Wikipedia policy or your own ideal? I see plenty of other alternative covers on album and single articles. The reason I added it was that there's a mention in the "Rescue Me" article of the very different UK cover, a photograph shot by Jean-Baptiste Mondino, so I thought it was notable to include in the article, and readers may wonder what that cover looked like seeing it had been mentioned. Anyway, you seem to be in charge of the Madonna articles so I guess what you says goes. --Geach (talk) 13:25, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Geach, if you see the line present in the article, it is WP:OR, original research from whoever added it. Also a separate image needs strong rationale per WP:NFCC#3a, WP:NFCC#3b and WP:NFCC#8 policies of Wikipedia. Also, I can see from Official UK Charts governing body that the release was with the same cover art. That is an absolute reliable source rather than what is present now. —IB [ Poke ] 13:35, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh well, I can't argue against that. By the way, as a UK resident I actually have both versions of "Rescue Me" in my record collection - the 7" vinyl has the 'UK cover' and my CD version (made in Germany) has the 'normal' cover. I think some more research needs to be done into it because different covers for "Rescue Me" do exist out there! --Geach (talk) 13:57, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Vogue"

Why don't you work on this iconic song of Madonna instead of the EDM dud? I think it's one of Madonna's best and is personally my favorite of her work. I would have worked on it myself but I have never contributed to a song article so I'm not sure. Anyway, I hope you do have a plan for this song and I'll try to be of a lil bit of help. -- Frankie talk 14:12, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@FrB.TG: I'm kinda in a mellow mood nowadays, so is actually working on the Madonna ballad articles like "You'll See". Have you heard it? If not you should. I have "Vogue" on my mind shortly though. —IB [ Poke ] 14:16, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Cleanup Barnstar
I don't know from where you got that detergent to clean up the Gaga article. I need that too :D -- Frankie talk 21:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's looking so much better that I even think we should put it for WP:PR, just saying.

I CANT WITH THIS DETERGENT LMAAAO great work!!! GagaNutellatalk 21:17, 26 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]