Talk:Hubli
![]() | India: Cities / Karnataka Start‑class Mid‑importance | |||||||||||||||
|
Why IT industries of Belgaum ??
This is a page for Hubballi. But I see IT industry listing of North Karnataka region. Also, There is Lot of Dharwad related information. Please have separate page for those different subjects. I will remove the content in another few days if nobody removes it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lokesh 2000 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
I agree with Mr Lokesh, there not much related information about Hubli, it should be there.
Clean up Needed
The article has become a mess. several sections should go as separate articles but can have links from main article. for example IT industries of north karanataka, Historical regions in north karnataka, information about dharwad should be in their appropriate article. could anybody do the cleanup? I'm finding no time to do the cleanup.
Lokesh 2000 (talk) 04:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
definitely needs a thorough clean up --Crazysoul (talk) 07:58, 18 April 2008 (UTC)
The list of IT industries, colleges, real estate developers, etc, seems more like a reference list than a article. It is better to name one or two major companies and move the rest to sub-articles. Anyone with better knowledge of hubli area may take the initiative to do this and give a better shape to this article --Crazysoul (talk) 18:43, 2 June 2008 (UTC)
Article improvement
I tried to cleanup messy things in the article but it is still horrible. I think we need to remove the list of IT industries and can add a paragraph describing the present IT scenario in the city. Also, Add more content to tourism section. We need to develop this in the same way as Bangalore article. Lokesh 2000 (talk) 08:22, 4 August 2008 (UTC)
SEO Links
There are many links which are no where connected with Hubballi. I guess links are listed for SEO purpose, not for public information. As Lokesh mentioned, it is mess and need serious cleanup. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Phpses (talk • contribs) 13:07, 26 August 2008 (UTC)
Help Review / Clean up
,m./n;l',
1. Personalities of Hubli/Hubbali
2. This page has to be specific to Hubballi or Hubli-Dharwad ?
3. References to commercial entities
4. Overall table of content
--Vinayak Kulkarni (Bangalore) (talk) 07:10, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Veeragase.jpg
The image Image:Veeragase.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --04:48, 4 November 2008 (UTC)
Hubballi or Hubli?
This is to notify that Hubli hasn't yet been renamed Hubballi Yet.
Refer discussion at the page of Bangalore
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Bangalore/Archive_4#Bangalore_or_Bengaluru.3F
Swaroop (talk) 06:40, 16 July 2010 (UTC)
Requested Move 2010
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Propaniac (talk) 18:47, 5 August 2010 (UTC)
Hubballi → Hubli — Name change to Hubballi not yet approved by Government of India Discussion: Bangalore Also: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/4746303.cms Regards. Swaroop (talk) 17:45, 24 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support We are not governed on Wikipedia by what the Government of India (or any other government) decides, but by common use in English (in this case, as national varieties of English apply, in Indian English). A quick Google search in English, confined to sources in India, for Hubballi excluding Wikipedia and Hubli gives 257,000 hits; a search for Hubli excluding Hubballi and Wikipedia gives 19,900,000 hits. Confining that search to hits from the last year produces the same pattern. Clearly the common use is still Hubli. Skinsmoke (talk) 11:51, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
- Support No official name change. --Redtigerxyz Talk 12:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
- Oppose That source quoted by nom is Jun 2009, so outdated. Uber crowds (talk) 12:20, 2 August 2010 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Added external link to Hubli - Dharwad City Guide
Request editors to review content on the website http://www.hubli-dharwad-city-guide.com. I myself own the website and hence it would be wise enough if the same is reviewed. If the website does not provide any additional value to Wikipedia visitors, then the same can be removed.
Thanks. Vishalkumarnjain (talk) 12:18, 30 July 2010 (UTC)
I don't really know the policies relating to this kind of external site stuff, but I guess we cannot review it. But personally, I think its a good start for a site, Regards. Swaroop (talk) 12:18, 1 August 2010 (UTC)
Requested move 18 October 2014
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: consensus not to move the page at this time, per the discussion below. Dekimasuよ! 18:54, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Hubli → Hubballi – Government of India on 17-Oct-2014 cleared renaming 12 cities and towns of the Karnataka state, eight years after receiving a proposal from Karnataka government, Hubli as Hubballi. varma (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
Survey
- Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with
*'''Support'''
or*'''Oppose'''
, then sign your comment with~~~~
. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's policy on article titles.
- Oppose WP:COMMONNAME. --Redtigerxyz Talk 19:05, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose obviously not the commonly recognised name. —innotata 22:48, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- Oppose. we should stick to WP:COMMONNAME. - Trinidade (talk) 08:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
Discussion
- Any additional comments:
[1][2] - varma (talk) 11:40, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.