Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests
Appearance
If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."
![]() | If you are here because you want an admin to approve of your new article or your proposed page move, you are in the wrong place.
|
- To list a technical request: Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:
This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.{{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}
the - If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
- If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.
Technical requests
Uncontroversial technical requests
- Loki's Wager (currently a redirect to Loki's wager) → Loki's wager (move · discuss) – per MOSCAP's guidance on theories, arguments, etc Primergrey (talk) 21:10, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- George Warren Brown School of Social Work → Brown School at Washington University in St. Louis (move) – the name of the school has changed due to changes in the programs offered, refer to their website to see this new name listed: https://brownschool.wustl.edu/ Vicvicand (talk) 19:38, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Kyon Hwon (currently a redirect to Kyŏn Hwŏn) → Kyŏn Hwŏn (move · discuss) – WP:NCKO does not prohibit the use of diacritics in article titles about people; a close reading of the policy tells that the restriction about not using diacritics in article titles is actually specifically for places. See talk page of NCKO; we discuss this nuance on there. toobigtokale (talk) 02:12, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- Wang Sing-nyom (currently a redirect to Wang Sing-nyŏm) → Wang Sing-nyŏm (move · discuss) – Diacritics for Korean can be in article title; should match what's done in the body. See Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (Korean); we discuss the nuance. Currently the diacritic restriction (soon to be removed) only applies to place names, not other things. toobigtokale (talk) 08:22, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
Requests to revert undiscussed moves
- Yampil, Vinnytsia Oblast → Yampil (move · discuss) – Old undiscussed move not necessarily in accordance with WP:PRIMARY RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yampil → Yampil (disambiguation) (currently a redirect back to Yampil) (move · discuss) – see previous RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 18:13, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @RadioactiveBoulevardier can you find a Diff (see Help:Diff § Internal links) to the old move? I think this might need to be discussed? microbiologyMarcus [petri dish·growths] 14:46, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- [1]
- Well, technically I don’t see the issue. It’s an undiscussed move in a remote corner and there’s no hard deadline to grandfather the move in. There is a solid WP:PRIMARYTOPIC argument (if you exclude the war-related coverage of Yampil, Donetsk Oblast) so RMUM why not?
- RadioactiveBoulevardier (talk) 00:43, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- The Elephant Stone is invalid. Must create The Elephant Stone before requesting that it be moved to Draft:The Elephant Stone.– A declined draft being moved to mainspace anyway by its creator. (Also likely but unresolved block evasion per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iptesh Kumar Meher.) Belbury (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Ramgarh Hill, Gandabahali is invalid. Must create Ramgarh Hill, Gandabahali before requesting that it be moved to Draft:Ramgarh Hills.– Declined draft being moved to mainspace anyway. (Likely but unresolved block evasion per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iptesh Kumar Meher.) Belbury (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Shiva Temple, Gandabahali is invalid. Must create Shiva Temple, Gandabahali before requesting that it be moved to Draft:Shiv Temple, Gandabahali.– Declined draft being moved to mainspace anyway. (Likely but unresolved block evasion per Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Iptesh Kumar Meher.) Belbury (talk) 16:33, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
Contested technical requests
- Megan Is Missing → Megan is Missing (currently a redirect back to Megan Is Missing) (move · discuss) – Silent correction of the copular verb "is" into the lower-case for minor grammatical reasons. Nineteen Ninety-Four guy (talk) 15:15, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per MOS:CT, which says to capitalize verbs in the titles of works such as films, and specifically mentions "is" as a verb to be capitalized. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:35, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Socialist Unity Party (currently a redirect to Socialist Unity Party of Germany) → Socialist Unity Party (disambiguation) (move · discuss) – The Socialist Unity Party of Germany is the clear WP:PRIMARYTOPIC for 'Socialist Unity Party', and as such the latter should be turned into a redirect pointing towards the former. The disambiguation page would simply be mentioned in a hatnote. Loytra (talk) 13:09, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Socialist Unity Party has gone from primary redirect to dabpage, then back to primary redirect, then back to dabpage. See WP:RMCM: "A move is potentially controversial if (...) there has been any past debate about the best title for the page; someone could reasonably disagree with the move." 162 etc. (talk) 04:21, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- According to what policy? If something is very clearly the primary topic, I'm not at all sure why a move would be considered contested or controversial. Loytra (talk) 02:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. 162 etc. (talk) 01:14, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Like That (Future and Metro Boomin song) (currently a redirect to Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song)) → Like That (Future, Metro Boomin and Kendrick Lamar song) (move · discuss) – Kendrick Lamar is credited as a main artist on the song, so his name should be in the disambiguator. Source: https://music.apple.com/us/album/like-that/1737149923?i=1737150439 98.6.144.50 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc.: here are some more sources of him being credited as a main artist: https://open.spotify.com/track/2tudvzsrR56uom6smgOcSf?si=90vqYEc1Rimvw6wVhBKraA&context=spotify%3Aplaylist%3A37i9dQZF1DX0XUsuxWHRQd, https://tidal.com/track/352641780 (you can look at the album here to see for track 6), and even the YouTube channel of one of the artists of the song himself: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=N9bKBAA22Go. Thank you. 98.6.144.50 (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Cinderella (Future and Metro Boomin song) (currently a redirect to Cinderella (Future, Metro Boomin and Travis Scott song)) → Cinderella (Future, Metro Boomin and Travis Scott song) (move · discuss) – Travis Scott is credited as a main artist on the song, so his name should be in the disambiguator. Source: https://music.apple.com/us/album/cinderella/1737149923?i=1737150446 98.6.144.50 (talk) 00:54, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- @162 etc.: here are some more sources of him being credited as a main artist: https://open.spotify.com/track/0hKtu53OlIFXVuYkZwcn3o?si=ZtnfMacUSvKHorJz6TkMEA&context=spotify%3Aplaylist%3A37i9dQZF1DX0XUsuxWHRQd, https://tidal.com/track/352641783 (you can look at the album here to see for track 9), and even the YouTube channel of one of the artists of the song himself: https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=onP2eoO7byc. Thank you. 98.6.144.50 (talk) 23:58, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Most sources list him as a feature. More citations needed. 162 etc. (talk) 15:41, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain → She'll Be Coming Round the Mountain (currently a redirect back to She'll Be Coming 'Round the Mountain) (move · discuss) – The apostrophe preceding the word "round" is not needed. Zacwill (talk) 22:08, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Only one source cited in the article has the song name in its title, and it uses "Around". The apostrophe seems needed to indicate the omission of the "A" at the beginning of that word. The Carl Sandburg source uses "Comin' Round", which also has an apostrophe, although in a different place. — BarrelProof (talk) 00:26, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fribourg railway station (currently a redirect to Fribourg/Freiburg railway station) → Fribourg/Freiburg railway station (move · discuss) – use of the official naming of this station because Fribourg is a bilingual city Swiss512 (talk) 17:05, 22 March 2024 (UTC)
- It seems highly unlikely to me that this dual name is really the common name - people probably call it one or the other, not both. * Pppery * it has begun... 15:42, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your reply. It seems the name Fribourg/Freiburg is used by the different railways operators that stop at this station.
- Here are some examples:
- https://www.sbb.ch/fr/informations-voyages/gares/trouver-gare/gare-de-fribourg-freiburg.html
- https://www.bls.ch/en/freizeit-und-ferien/charter/flotte-rabe-515-mutz
- https://www.bls.ch/-/media/bls/pdf/fahrplaene/bahn/netzplaene/netzplan-s-bahn-bern.pdf
- https://www.tpf.ch/Portals/0/Images/Fichiers//Horaires%20et%20plans//Plans%20du%20r%C3%A9seau//2024/Plan%20RER%20(A6).pdf
- https://www.sbb.ch/content/dam/internet/sbb/fr/fahrplan/bahnverkehrsinformation/zuege-linien/plan-rer-fr-2023.pdf.sbbdownload.pdf
- Other articles have the station names in the two languages like : Murten/Morat railway station Sierre/Siders railway station and Biel/Bienne railway station. Therefore I think the article name should be changed. Swiss512 (talk) 18:26, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- British Canoeing (currently a redirect to Paddle UK) → Paddle UK (move · discuss) – British Canoeing has changed its name to Paddle UK Slightlyscared (talk) 22:44, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- As usual, WP:NAMECHANGES evidence is required here. Are reliable sources routinely using the new name? "Paddle UK" sounds more like a trademark or gimmicky title than the actual name that's likely to be commonly used, but I could be wrong. — Amakuru (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- GhostInTheMachine has performed the suggested move at 11:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC) – possibly without awareness of this request. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- I was not aware of any request, I just got a standard watchlist alert from Slightlyscared's edit to the article. The organisation has changed their "working" name and rebranded to match. Their old website also redirects to a new website under the new name. There is a very small argument for expanding the redirect into an article about the underlying company, but it has little independent existence — GhostInTheMachine talk to me 17:09, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- GhostInTheMachine has performed the suggested move at 11:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC) – possibly without awareness of this request. — BarrelProof (talk) 15:38, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- As usual, WP:NAMECHANGES evidence is required here. Are reliable sources routinely using the new name? "Paddle UK" sounds more like a trademark or gimmicky title than the actual name that's likely to be commonly used, but I could be wrong. — Amakuru (talk) 23:23, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- Congregational church (currently a redirect to Congregationalism) → Congregationalism (move · discuss) – This article discusses the tradition broadly rather than a particular church or churches. Move follows wiki naming conventions, see Presbyterianism vs Presbyterian polity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dirkwillems (talk • contribs) 17:24, 26 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the request to have the current title (and a sig). It hasn't been at Congregationalist church (with -ist) since 2004. SilverLocust 💬 07:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @Dirkwillems: While this would follow the example of Presbyterian(ism/ polity), that example alone doesn't create a naming convention. It seems quite likely that there would be different views on how to title this and which article (if any) would be the primary topic for "Congregationalism" (it currently redirects to the other article, Congregationalist polity, as a WP:PRIMARYREDIRECT as asserted almost 4 years ago). This move is potentially controversial, so it would require a requested-move discussion, which you can begin by clicking "discuss" on your request. You can remove this request after opening a discussion (or if you do not want to continue). SilverLocust 💬 07:27, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed the request to have the current title (and a sig). It hasn't been at Congregationalist church (with -ist) since 2004. SilverLocust 💬 07:13, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Russian internal conflict detailed map (currently a redirect to Template:2024 Belgorod incursion detailed map) → Template:2024 Belgorod incursion detailed map (move · discuss) – This map only shows the Belgorod region, not all of Russia, nor is there any real conflict outside of belgorod kursk, and maybe bryansk and vorozenh 68.132.201.101 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Since this could potentially fall under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War, it should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Since this could potentially fall under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War, it should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Ahecht (TALK
- Module:Russian internal conflict detailed map (currently a redirect to Module:2024 Belgorod incursion detailed map) → Module:2024 Belgorod incursion detailed map (move · discuss) – This map only shows the Belgorod region, not all of Russia, nor is there any real conflict outside of belgorod kursk, and maybe bryansk and vorozenh 68.132.201.101 (talk) 21:38, 25 March 2024 (UTC)
- Since this could potentially fall under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War, it should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:53, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- Since this could potentially fall under Wikipedia:General sanctions/Russo-Ukrainian War, it should probably be discussed on the talk page first. --Ahecht (TALK
- Schlutzkrapfen → Mezzelune (currently a redirect back to Schlutzkrapfen) (move) – More common name. JackkBrown (talk) 18:36, 27 March 2024 (UTC)
- The article's current title is the result of one editor's declaration in February 2022 that the dish originated in a German-speaking territory of Italy, so the German name should be used. The current request is for the Italian title to be restored, but the requester offered no evidence on whether that really is more common, and none of the sources in the article address the matter. I suggest finding further evidence that one of these really is the original title of the dish, and if a reliable source confirms one over the other, then that will be the article title here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JackkBrown: Since this has been contested in the past, please discuss this on the talk page. Based on my quick reading of Google Trends, it looks like Schlutzkrapfen is only the more common term in Germany and Austria, whereas Mezzelune is overwhelmingly the more common term in English-speaking countries. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 20:40, 29 March 2024 (UTC)
- @JackkBrown: Since this has been contested in the past, please discuss this on the talk page. Based on my quick reading of Google Trends, it looks like Schlutzkrapfen is only the more common term in Germany and Austria, whereas Mezzelune is overwhelmingly the more common term in English-speaking countries. --Ahecht (TALK
- The article's current title is the result of one editor's declaration in February 2022 that the dish originated in a German-speaking territory of Italy, so the German name should be used. The current request is for the Italian title to be restored, but the requester offered no evidence on whether that really is more common, and none of the sources in the article address the matter. I suggest finding further evidence that one of these really is the original title of the dish, and if a reliable source confirms one over the other, then that will be the article title here. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 16:51, 28 March 2024 (UTC)