Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Voorts (talk | contribs) at 22:41, 4 March 2024 (→‎Uncontroversial technical requests: adding request). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

Note: I can make Hunawng a redirect to the other Hunawng/Hunaung after this move; overall there are three villages with similar names I'm attempting WP:NATURAL disambiguation with based on the english romanizations used by the two sources I found (the two "Hulaung"s have different Burmese names, so it's a romanization choice to disambiguate) EmeraldRange (talk/contribs) 19:58, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

Unless and until the French writer has an article on the English Wikipedia, this article title is unambiguous. Adding "Peralta" simply for the sake of disambiguation also violates WP:COMMONNAME. 162 etc. (talk) 16:43, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Benjamin Bryant (broadcaster)  Benjamin Bryant (move · discuss) – Subject is only current, living person named "Benjamin Bryant" on Wikipedia, and is the top result on Google and Bing for "Benjamin Bryant." Additionally, descriptor (broadcaster) is insufficient/inaccurate. Article documents valid notability in multiple fields, including as government official on historic projects, actor/filmmaker, and as a media figure (including, but not limited to, broadcasting). This title is currently a redirect to the disambiguation page. MHWood82 (talk) 20:42, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Primary topic grabs are, by definition, not uncontroversial. Dabpage has been moved back to its stable title. 162 etc. (talk) 22:33, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The usage of "clones" is accurate here because there are multiple Apple II clones. The singular would be used if there was only one clone. EggRoll97 (talk) 00:43, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This should go through AFC in my opinion. I have my doubts of whether it would survive a deletion discussion. EggRoll97 (talk) 23:14, 3 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I have never gone through AFC unless a WP:COI. On what grounds would this be deleted. It should be clear that an influencer is different than an Internet celebrity, which is the point. Some internet celebrities are not influencers and some influencers are not internet celebrities. Thus, we need a new article. This is stub/start territory, but not AFD territory.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@TonyTheTiger The place to discuss this would be the talk page for Internet celebrity. I see you tried and got no response, but you didn't use WP:PROPSPLIT, which would help. You could also let various related wikiprojects know about the discussion. -- asilvering (talk) 06:24, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
TonyTheTiger is well past the autoconfirmed threshhold and unlikely to have a CoI here. I fail to see why this would need to go through AfC, as AfC encourages established editors to create articles on their own. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:32, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Three editors have already expressed WP:N concerns, so this should definitely be discussed somewhere, and WP:RMT is not the best place for that. I see OP has opened a thread at Talk:Internet celebrity#Splitting article, but no discussion ensued. 162 etc. (talk) 16:47, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Understood, but AFC isn't the best place for that either. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:59, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Main issue I see here is that content from Internet celebrity would need to be moved to the new article as well, rather than just a new page. As asilvering put it, proposing through PROPSPLIT would make most sense here, as I don't doubt there is enough content that already exists on IC to move to Inlufencer. Best of luck with it. CommunityNotesContributor (talk) 22:17, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Given the previous RM and Amakuru's revert, this needs a new WP:RM. GTrang (talk) 00:23, 4 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed