Wikipedia:Requested moves/Technical requests

Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

This is an old revision of this page, as edited by Asukite (talk | contribs) at 21:24, 8 March 2023 (→‎Uncontroversial technical requests: done - Tōkyū Setagaya Line (some discussion on the matter in this rev if this comes back later)). The present address (URL) is a permanent link to this revision, which may differ significantly from the current revision.

If you are unable to complete a move for technical reasons, you can request technical help below. This is the correct method if you tried to move a page, but you got an error message saying something like "You do not have permission to move this page, for the following reasons:..." or "The/This page could not be moved, for the following reason:..."

  • To list a technical request: edit the Uncontroversial technical requests subsection and insert the following code at the bottom of the list, filling in pages and reason:

    {{subst:RMassist|current page title|new title|reason=edit summary for the move}}

    This will automatically insert a bullet and include your signature. Please do not edit the article's talk page.
  • If you object to a proposal listed in the uncontroversial technical requests section, please move the request to the Contested technical requests section, append a note on the request elaborating on why, and sign with ~~~~. Consider pinging the requester to let them know about the objection.
  • If your technical request is contested, or if a contested request is left untouched without reply, create a requested move on the article talk and remove the request from the section here. The fastest and easiest way is to click the "discuss" button at the request, save the talk page, and remove the entry on this page.

Technical requests

Uncontroversial technical requests

  • Fall River Marksmen (currently a redirect to Fall River F.C. (1922–1931))  Fall River F.C. (currently a redirect instead to Fall River F.C. (1932)) (move · discuss) – There is a previously moved article called Fall River F.C. that has been moved to Fall River F.C. (1932). So the redirect is currently occupied preventing Fall River Marksmen moving there. -- Libro0 (talk) 04:41, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, would you please be able to show evidence that the club from the 1920's should be at the base title, while the one from the 1930's should have a disambiguator? As opposed to, for example, a dabpage at the base title? Dr. Vogel (talk) 08:43, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    Courtesy ping @Libro0 Silikonz💬 21:26, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
    I'm not sure I can provide evidence to that effect. I can provide countless references to what the team's official name is. The other team played a season in 1932 and was significantly less notable. I can provide citations in their respective articles. It would help me to organize these articles which need more attention. The 1920's team was quite notable and had the name much longer. This information is shown in these articles. Titling articles with nicknames should be avoided because I have renamed an article that had a totally erroneous nickname while other teams have had several nicknames over different periods. Libro0 (talk) 00:04, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Requests to revert undiscussed moves

Contested technical requests

This one does not appear to be necessary. There is only one other article in WP with "44 Minutes" in the title, and that is the TV film which has the much longer title "44 Minutes: The North Hollywood Shoot-Out". Therefore the Megadeth song is the only article that is literally called "44 Minutes" and there is no need for disambiguation. "See also..." hatnotes at the top of each of the two articles should suffice. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 13:44, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, the film has a longer name, but subtitles are often omitted from topic names (see MOS:SUBTITLE). Without the subtitle, the name is identical. Do we have any evidence that people using "44 Minutes" by itself are primarily looking for the song rather than the film? —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 14:00, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
My opinion is that the film's official title is the entire thing with no subtitle involved, which was probably intended to tell audiences that it was about a real-life event that was recently in the news. But I have no dispute with other interpretations. ---DOOMSDAYER520 (TALK|CONTRIBS) 14:47, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
With the DVD box just "44 Minutes" and 131 views vs 4 for the song, the song would be such a weak case for WP:PT that restoring (song) is easier to do than go to RM. But if it must go to RM, then support. In ictu oculi (talk) 16:53, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
I have no view either way on this, but given the discussion here it possibly warrants a WP:RM. -Kj cheetham (talk) 19:16, 8 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator needed