User talk:Shmego

Typhoon Mindulle (2021), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 20% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Robert McClenon (talk) 20:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachid Ghanimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Shmego! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Greenman (talk) 09:07, 23 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

No significant secondary sources in the article, probably not notable anyways since he hasn't appeared in a professional match.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Jonathan Gomes and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 14:23, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SportingFlyer was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Doesn't quite pass WP:GNG yet.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anders Bordoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SportingFlyer T·C 14:27, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Divine Teah, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 17:04, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Oltrepier were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

There's still so much work to do about the lack of significant coverage: you should avoid using portals like Transfermarkt and SofaScore, since they contain mostly user-generated content, and replace them with (for example) articles from Moroccan and/or African media who do mention Ghanimi extensively, either in match reports or in dedicated articles. Try taking a look at the proposed lay-out for player bios, as well!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachid Ghanimi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Oltrepier (talk) 16:59, 1 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Anders Bordoy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:18, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rachid Ghanimi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachid Ghanimi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:17, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Alenga Charles is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alenga Charles until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Anwegmann (talk) 03:32, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Shmego, I have restored the redirect from Draft:Tropical Storm Karl (2022) to the 2022 AHS article. While you have added a couple sentences of information, the draft still doesn't contain more information than the existing storm subsection in the season article. I would suggest that you add depth to the season article section rather than reviving this draft again. 2022 Atlantic hurricane season#Tropical Storm Karl is, I believe, the best place to tell the story of this tropical storm. Cheers. Drdpw (talk) 22:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I respect that you let me know, and I do understand what you mean. I figured that a storm with >$75 million in damages and 3 deaths deserves an article. However, I do understand where you are coming from and unless information is resurfaced, I will most likely leave the draft as it is.

Regards, Shmego (talk) 13:25, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tropical Storm Bret (2023), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 16:50, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey there Shmego! Hope you're having a good summer so far. I wanted to check what aspect of tropical cyclones you're most interested in, and if you need any help from someone who's been here for a while. Cheers ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:10, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. I've been interested in tropical cyclones since 2021, so not as long as some other experienced editors. When it comes to storms, I'm really interested in impacts caused by them, whether they are major impacts or minor ones. I live in an area of the US that is occasionally hit by storms, but almost always by the remnants, never a truly tropical system, so I like to see what storms do to impact areas. Of course i also like to track them, but seeing the damage caused by these storms has always interested me. I don't think I need any help at this moment, but thanks for checking.

Regards, Shmego (talk) 19:36, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! I can relate. I grew up in New Jersey, and there very few actual tropical systems hitting us. Even Sandy was post-tropical. I don't know where you're from other than the US, but, I wanted to point out that we have lists of tropical cyclones in a lot of the states. For example, I wrote List of New Jersey hurricanes, my home state, and probably need to do more work on it tbh. So just throwing it out there, just about every state will eventually have its own "List of X hurricanes". Even Wisconsin has one right now. And I find these lists really interesting and fun to do, because it uncovers the climatology and history for a certain area. Places like Florida get hurricanes all the time. But Nevada? Michigan? Sometimes, and I hope they eventually gets lists as well. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:58, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah. At least one hurricane has effected every US state, even Washington and Oregon got the remnants of a Pacific typhoon, and I think Wyoming got impacted by Hurricane Kathleen. I live in Pennsylvania so we have a similar situation, extratropical systems are all we get, like Ida in 2021. Creating lists of hurricanes to impact areas does seem like a fun process, you learn a lot and it seems pretty simple. Shmego (talk) 18:20, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ooh, and the List of Pennsylvania hurricanes is already started! It's just a bit of a mess, lol. Some of the biggest things missing are climatology (how often is the state hit, the earliest and latest), a table with the deadliest storms, and in general more information. Most of it is basic stuff like "A tropical storm caused winds of 65 km/h", which doesn't help much for a variety of reasons. Pennsylvania uses mph (not knots or km/h). Also it doesn't say what the storm did. And that's the fun part about writing these articles, figuring out which storms were the baddies. Now, Wikipedia probably has articles for the vast majority of storms affecting the state over the last century, so that should be fairly easy expanding on that, and adding other storms that affected the state but aren't on the list. Lastly, it might be nice to have a section like this where it shows the number of storms by month, and over time. I recently worked on California hurricanes, so it's fresh on my mind. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 18:52, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. I will certainly expand that one, the conversions to mph are certainly necessary, that would be annoying for someone to read. Shmego (talk) 19:26, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nice! That's a huge help. In the long term, it would be great if every state had an article where everything was in the correct units, was cited, and had the appropriate amount of info for each storm. Keep up the good work. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:40, 2 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]