User contributions for Tottingshire

Search for contributionsshowhide

⧼contribs-top⧽

Username, IP address or CIDR range:

Namespace:

Invert selection

Associated namespace

Tag filter:

Invert selection

Only show edits that are latest revisions

Only show edits that are page creations

Hide minor edits

⧼contribs-date⧽

From date:

To date:

Show only edits pending review

Hide probably good edits

14:1214:12, 22 March 2012 diff hist +4,855‎ Talk:Binomen ‎ reply to person who deleted my edits
14:1114:11, 22 March 2012 diff hist −4,843‎ Binomen ‎ Sorry! current
14:1014:10, 22 March 2012 diff hist +4,843‎ Binomen ‎No edit summary

17:2217:22, 8 March 2012 diff hist +84‎ Trinomen ‎ a trinomen does not have an author
17:0017:00, 8 March 2012 diff hist +275‎ Binomen ‎ binomina do not have authors
16:4816:48, 8 March 2012 diff hist +143‎ Binomen ‎ Surely "binomial name" can not be a pleonasm when "binominal name" is not a pleonasm
16:3816:38, 8 March 2012 diff hist +122‎ Binomen ‎ It is not a requirement. If it should be a requirement, then obviously it needs a reference to the provision in the ICZN that says so!

15:5415:54, 25 January 2012 diff hist +48‎ Species ‎ this is not a requirement
15:5215:52, 25 January 2012 diff hist +18‎ Species ‎ typo
15:5115:51, 25 January 2012 diff hist +28‎ Species ‎ species do not necessarily get a scientific name
15:4815:48, 25 January 2012 diff hist +192‎ Species ‎ emphasizing that zoology uses a quite different mechanism
15:3815:38, 25 January 2012 diff hist −8‎ Binomen ‎ That was not right
15:3215:32, 25 January 2012 diff hist +4‎ User talk:Tottingshire ‎ →‎Question

13:3713:37, 12 January 2012 diff hist +14‎ User talk:Tottingshire ‎No edit summary
13:3513:35, 12 January 2012 diff hist +156‎ Trinomen ‎ again, no such requirement
13:3013:30, 12 January 2012 diff hist +165‎ Trinomen ‎ correcting the same error that was in binomen. There is no formal requirement for typesetting, except that at least the first letter must be an upper-case letter
13:1713:17, 12 January 2012 diff hist +95‎ Binomen ‎ being explicit
13:0913:09, 12 January 2012 diff hist +12‎ N User:Tottingshire ‎ ←Created page with 'Tottingshire' current
13:0813:08, 12 January 2012 diff hist +10‎ Binomen ‎ Tightening this sentence. Why is this here? It has no bearing on the topic.
13:0613:06, 12 January 2012 diff hist +47‎ Binomen ‎ this is not peculiar to binomina, but a general habit
13:0413:04, 12 January 2012 diff hist +32‎ Binomen ‎ again, there is no such requirement
13:0213:02, 12 January 2012 diff hist +97‎ Binomen ‎ Emphasizing that the ICZN has no requirement for typesetting, but only recommends "a type-face (font) different from that used in the text"
12:5612:56, 12 January 2012 diff hist +32‎ Binomen ‎ much used equivalent
12:5512:55, 12 January 2012 diff hist +21‎ Binomen ‎ according to the definition in the ICZN
12:5012:50, 12 January 2012 diff hist −3‎ Binomen ‎ correcting weird error