User contributions for ThreeCheers321
A user with 15 edits. Account created on 25 March 2020.
25 June 2020
- 01:4301:43, 25 June 2020 diff hist −149 Subhash Kak Undid revision 964359352 by Heironymous Rowe (talk) That doesn't make any sense, you're avoiding giving actual reasoning for an attack on Subhash's work. Does it make sense to attack someone and then disprove it on a talk page? No. Respectfully, please stop this or I'll have to report it to higher users. Tag: Undo
- 01:4101:41, 25 June 2020 diff hist +498 User talk:ThreeCheers321 No edit summary
- 01:3801:38, 25 June 2020 diff hist −149 Subhash Kak Undid revision 964220337 by Heironymous Rowe (talk) The cited work, which you can review yourself, are insufficient to claim that Subhash's work on Indology has been rejected or "heavily criticized". If true, such claims need to be elaborated on in further sections, rather than attacking a person on frivolous claims. Tag: Undo
- 01:3001:30, 25 June 2020 diff hist −781 User talk:ThreeCheers321 →June 2020
24 June 2020
- 07:0607:06, 24 June 2020 diff hist +45 User talk:Joshua Jonathan →Please familiarize yourself with Indian scholarly work
- 07:0507:05, 24 June 2020 diff hist +724 User talk:Joshua Jonathan →Please familiarize yourself with Indian scholarly work: new section
- 07:0007:00, 24 June 2020 diff hist −6,226 User talk:ThreeCheers321 ←Blanked the page Tag: Blanking
- 06:5706:57, 24 June 2020 diff hist −149 m Subhash Kak Witzel's scholarly work cited here to critcize Subhash's work is outdated and wrong, if a person's work is to be criticized, please provide legitimate critique. Tag: Visual edit
30 May 2020
- 19:4519:45, 30 May 2020 diff hist +75 N User:ThreeCheers321 ←Created page with 'Welcome! I have an interest in History, Archeology, Hydrology, and Science.' current Tag: Visual edit
- 19:4419:44, 30 May 2020 diff hist −148 Subhash Kak The scholarly work cited here, particularly by Witzel, is now outdated and incorrect. Specifically, his criticism of the Sarasvati river has recently been proven incorrect in a 2017 paper published in Nature that reviewed the hydrological origin of a substantial river in the Ghaggar-Hakra that is located in the same region that the Rig Veda mentions. Witzel also cites that no horse existed in the Indian region prior to a supposed "Aryan migration", but bones of Equus Caballus have been found now Tag: Visual edit
- 19:3119:31, 30 May 2020 diff hist −281 m Subhash Kak Insufficient proof from the citation to make such an allegation. Tags: references removed Visual edit
25 May 2020
- 19:4019:40, 25 May 2020 diff hist −29 Dattatreya This is patently incorrect, the cow is revered and worshipped across all of India. Especially in south indian states like Andhra, Telangana, Karnataka, and Tamil Nadu. Tag: Visual edit
18 May 2020
- 22:3022:30, 18 May 2020 diff hist +3 Alchon Huns →Shivaism and Sun cult: proper grammar. Worship of Surya is not a cult. Tag: Visual edit
26 March 2020
- 13:5213:52, 26 March 2020 diff hist −18 m Malabar large-spotted civet Ayurvedic scienctifu literature doesn't contain perfume making methods or prescriptions, let alone with civets. Tags: Visual edit Mobile edit Mobile web edit
25 March 2020
- 00:5600:56, 25 March 2020 diff hist +638 Talk:Tide →Origin of the recognition of tidal physics in India: new section
