User contributions for Tae Hyun Song
A user with 50 edits. Account created on 8 December 2019.
27 September 2020
- 15:5615:56, 27 September 2020 diff hist +441 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
26 September 2020
- 10:2810:28, 26 September 2020 diff hist +327 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
25 September 2020
- 03:0703:07, 25 September 2020 diff hist +979 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
24 September 2020
- 13:4213:42, 24 September 2020 diff hist +461 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Judged Unconstitutional in South Carolina
12 December 2019
- 09:1509:15, 12 December 2019 diff hist +33 Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States "or criminal fines in plain english" added. Easier to read.
- 05:4905:49, 12 December 2019 diff hist +1,808 Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents →Tae Hyun Song: in defense.
- 04:1904:19, 12 December 2019 diff hist +229 Talk:Black hole →Missing Citations: Prove Gravity Warps Space, Prove Gravity Affects Time, Prove Gravity Affects Light.: new section
- 03:1603:16, 12 December 2019 diff hist +6 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis: Edit for easier reading
- 03:1403:14, 12 December 2019 diff hist −2,562 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis: - Removed redundant text for easier reading ~~~~
- 03:1103:11, 12 December 2019 diff hist −406 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 03:0903:09, 12 December 2019 diff hist +4 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 03:0703:07, 12 December 2019 diff hist +185 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Judged Unconstitutional in South Carolina
- 02:5702:57, 12 December 2019 diff hist −3,168 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
11 December 2019
- 11:4311:43, 11 December 2019 diff hist +154 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Judged Unconstitutional in South Carolina
- 11:4111:41, 11 December 2019 diff hist +2 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 11:3711:37, 11 December 2019 diff hist +114 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 07:0507:05, 11 December 2019 diff hist +1 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Judged Unconstitutional in South Carolina
- 07:0407:04, 11 December 2019 diff hist +477 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Judged Unconstitutional in South Carolina: new section
- 06:4906:49, 11 December 2019 diff hist −831 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 06:3106:31, 11 December 2019 diff hist −303 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 06:3006:30, 11 December 2019 diff hist +259 Civil forfeiture in the United States Clarified which rights are being violated, and unconstitutional in South Carolina with citations. ~~~~
- 05:5805:58, 11 December 2019 diff hist +72 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 05:4205:42, 11 December 2019 diff hist −115 Civil forfeiture in the United States ", with few legal protections and due process rules to protect them in situations where they are presumed guilty instead of being presumed innocent." 4th, 5th and 14th Amendments are the protections, which were violated.
- 02:1402:14, 11 December 2019 diff hist +127 Talk:Sun →Correcting Misconceptions
- 02:1002:10, 11 December 2019 diff hist +282 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis
- 01:5101:51, 11 December 2019 diff hist +979 Talk:Sun →Correcting Misconceptions: new section
- 01:1001:10, 11 December 2019 diff hist 0 Talk:Black hole →Black hole is a science fiction theory - Premise is Gravity can affect Time (False), Gravity can warp Space (False), Gravity can affect Light (False)
- 01:0901:09, 11 December 2019 diff hist +101 Talk:Black hole →Black hole is a science fiction theory - Premise is Gravity can affect Time (False), Gravity can warp Space (False), Gravity can affect Light (False)
- 01:0801:08, 11 December 2019 diff hist +85 Talk:Black hole →Black hole is a science fiction theory - Premise is Gravity can affect Time (False), Gravity can warp Space (False), Gravity can affect Light (False)
- 01:0401:04, 11 December 2019 diff hist +192 Talk:Black hole →Black hole is a science fiction theory - Premise is Gravity can affect Time (False), Gravity can warp Space (False), Gravity can affect Light (False): new section
- 00:4300:43, 11 December 2019 diff hist −171 Civil forfeiture in the United States Forgot to delete the line previous edit. Added "can be considered unconstitutional." with citation.
- 00:3800:38, 11 December 2019 diff hist +174 Civil forfeiture in the United States Deleted "with few legal protections and due process rules to protect them in situations where they are presumed guilty instead of being presumed innocent." 4th and 5th Amendments ARE their protection.
10 December 2019
- 07:1107:11, 10 December 2019 diff hist +2,773 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →Dissection and Analysis: new section
- 04:3004:30, 10 December 2019 diff hist +4 Asset forfeiture "not" added. In order for it to be a Criminal Justice Financial Obligation, it has to go through the what is referred to as "Due Process of Law". Unjust seizures were the reasons for adding The 4th and 5th Amendments to The Constitutions of the United States.
- 04:1804:18, 10 December 2019 diff hist +3 Civil forfeiture in the United States No edit summary
- 04:1704:17, 10 December 2019 diff hist +242 Civil forfeiture in the United States No edit summary
- 03:4803:48, 10 December 2019 diff hist −179 Civil forfeiture in the United States with few legal protections and due process rules to protect them in situations where they are presumed guilty instead of being presumed innocent. Obviously, This line wasn't well thought out. If your rights are violated, it's unconstitutional and unlawful
- 03:4303:43, 10 December 2019 diff hist +31 Civil forfeiture in the United States Added "and therefore unconstitutional." The owner's rights are violated.
9 December 2019
- 04:4304:43, 9 December 2019 diff hist +2,825 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →floated: Pointing out number of flaws and supplying details on the flaws.
- 03:1903:19, 9 December 2019 diff hist +4 Civil forfeiture in the United States "not" is inserted in front of Criminal justice financial obligations. If you read the Criminal Justice Financial Obligations which was badly written, you need to go through Due Process for it to be considered Criminal Justice Financial Obligations. Civil Seizure circumvents Due Process and therefore it not a CJFO ~~~~
- 03:0903:09, 9 December 2019 diff hist +8 Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States Inserted "but not" to property forfeiture. Property Forfeiture does not require being processed through the Criminal Justice System. Property is simply seized without Due Process. It was worded so badly it wasn't spotted right away. ~~~~ Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 03:0303:03, 9 December 2019 diff hist +3 Criminal-justice financial obligations in the United States This article is worded badly. "their involvement in" was replaced with "being processed through" to show they are taken through Due Process. ~~~~ Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 02:2402:24, 9 December 2019 diff hist +3 Civil forfeiture in the United States "sometimes" called change to "more accurately". Example: Police are allowed to "seize" property without charging the owner (a violation of the 4th and 5th amendment). Example: The property is only "forfeit", if the owner is unable to mount a successful defense. Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
8 December 2019
- 21:4121:41, 8 December 2019 diff hist +2,838 Talk:Jesus →Category:People whose existence is disputed
- 20:3420:34, 8 December 2019 diff hist +282 Talk:Black hole →Request for removing of a "black hole image" of an Event Horizon Telescope from Wiki page
- 09:5209:52, 8 December 2019 diff hist +2 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →floated
- 09:5009:50, 8 December 2019 diff hist +242 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →floated
- 09:2609:26, 8 December 2019 diff hist +1,920 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →floated
- 05:5805:58, 8 December 2019 diff hist +2,224 Talk:Civil forfeiture in the United States →floated
- 04:3204:32, 8 December 2019 diff hist +3 m Civil forfeiture in the United States "sometimes referred to as" to "more accurately" because that is what it really is. It only ends up being forfeiture if the owner can not afford an attorney. "Forfeiture" is used in place of "seizure" to prevent anyone from immediately noticing seizing someone's property without due process is unconstitutional an unlawful.
