User contributions for Suppcuzz

A user with 1,008 edits. Account created on 13 June 2009.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

14 August 2023

  • 20:2120:21, 14 August 2023 diff hist −47 MurzynThe word is not considered as a racial slur, but it is controversial and might be pejorative in certain context. Mostly it is neutral when used in a neutral context. Therefore it cannot be classified as a slur.
  • 20:1720:17, 14 August 2023 diff hist +2 MurzynIt was never called a racial slur by any black person in the cited article. It was considered pejorative. A subjective title of one article can not determine the definition! And it is not considered offensive by all black people.

21 April 2023

9 April 2023

5 April 2023

3 April 2023

15 March 2023

3 December 2022

12 August 2022

  • 14:1514:15, 12 August 2022 diff hist +9 Untermensch1. The word "ethnic" must be mentioned because it was about ethnicity. 2. Ukrainians were part of the suhuman notion partially, as the Ukrainian Insurgent Army was heavily inspired by Nazi Germany, also collaborating with the Nazis. Bandera faction of OUN admired aspects of Nazism.

18 July 2022

6 June 2022

25 May 2022

1 October 2021

14 September 2021

  • 21:5421:54, 14 September 2021 diff hist −16 UntermenschUkrainians were not considered subhumans for a long time, even longer than the Russians (Ribbentrop-Molotov pact was friendship between Soviet Union and Nazi Germany). The Ukrainian Insurgent Army (UPA) volunteered to assist the Wehrmacht.

21 August 2021

19 July 2021

30 May 2021

18 May 2021

22 March 2021

20 March 2021

8 March 2021

5 March 2021

26 February 2021

13 February 2021

12 February 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)