User contributions for Steth
A user with 673 edits. Account created on 28 January 2006.
12 November 2007
- 22:5122:51, 12 November 2007 diff hist +749 User talk:Random user 39849958 →Advice: You are not alone, Levine
3 September 2007
- 13:5013:50, 3 September 2007 diff hist +224 Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 August 28 →Category:Quack medicine: Delete
26 June 2007
- 23:3723:37, 26 June 2007 diff hist +1,715 Talk:Chiropractic →Question about NACM: Did NACM even really ever exist as representing chiropractic?
- 03:3703:37, 26 June 2007 diff hist +400 Talk:Chiropractic Question for Fyslee about NACM
22 June 2007
- 02:5202:52, 22 June 2007 diff hist +660 Talk:Chiropractic →Will we ever learn the facts about NACM?: What! NACM, with no meetings, elections or seminars, a fake sham front? No way!
20 June 2007
- 02:5802:58, 20 June 2007 diff hist −706 Chiropractic →Reform: No proof that reformers share anything with NACM or ever did. I have explained it on the talk page.
- 02:5602:56, 20 June 2007 diff hist +1,132 Talk:Chiropractic →Will we ever learn the facts about NACM?: No we won't because there are no facts for a shadowy, sham 'association'.
- 02:4002:40, 20 June 2007 diff hist +915 Talk:Stephen Barrett /* If Stephen Barrett can handle the news about his board failure, why can't others?
18 June 2007
- 23:0823:08, 18 June 2007 diff hist +3,061 Talk:Chiropractic →Will we ever learn the facts about NACM?: Yes I am Levine 2113
- 04:2104:21, 18 June 2007 diff hist +2,467 Talk:Chiropractic Requesting information from Fyslee regarding NACM. Thanks!
16 June 2007
- 02:3102:31, 16 June 2007 diff hist +476 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM's current status is a [[straw man]] here: Artie, can I make an appointment with your boss?
15 June 2007
- 22:0822:08, 15 June 2007 diff hist +830 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM's current status is a [[straw man]] here: Good one Artie! Still sharp!
- 17:3117:31, 15 June 2007 diff hist +2,810 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM's current status is a [[straw man]] here: School's OUT! NACM = Toss everything out that is chiropractic. Huh? No chiropractic 'school of thought that I am familiar with.
- 12:1812:18, 15 June 2007 diff hist +4,327 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM's current status is a [[straw man]] here: NACM fails the smell test = No meetings, research, seminars, elections. Membership?? Who knows?? Without membership, no school of thought.
14 June 2007
- 03:4303:43, 14 June 2007 diff hist +295 Talk:Chiropractic →Please move this conversation: Sorry Artie, don't shoot the messenger.
13 June 2007
- 23:4223:42, 13 June 2007 diff hist +1,437 Talk:Chiropractic →Please move this conversation: Admin/editor conflicts.
- 02:5202:52, 13 June 2007 diff hist +603 Talk:Chiropractic →Please move this conversation: Don't salute to the NACM flag? Get clubbed.
12 June 2007
- 18:1818:18, 12 June 2007 diff hist +453 Talk:Stephen Barrett →Motion to adjourn with "no consensus, material excluded": A good biography is a sanitized biography -- NOT!
- 15:0615:06, 12 June 2007 diff hist +669 Talk:Chiropractic →Please move this conversation: Any proof NACM is still breathing? Where is the membership list?
- 14:5414:54, 12 June 2007 diff hist −729 Chiropractic →Reform: Hate? I don't hate NACM. How can you hate a shadow or someone's wet dream? Perhaps Fyslee is projecting his hatred of chiropractic? No proof NACM still exists. Got members? Are You?
11 June 2007
- 03:5603:56, 11 June 2007 diff hist 0 Talk:Chiropractic →Reform Chiro Tidbit: Spelling - I thought it didn't look right
- 03:3003:30, 11 June 2007 diff hist −729 Chiropractic →Reform: rmv NACM reverting to long-standing version- still fails smell test see Talk page. It was removed from article a number of times over the past year or two and was not in for a long time.
- 03:2403:24, 11 June 2007 diff hist +3,739 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM: OK, I'm back now, too.. Response to AvB - NACM - Gift-wrapping a fish that's been dead for years with a pretty pink bow doesn't help it suddenly pass the smell test.
10 June 2007
- 04:0704:07, 10 June 2007 diff hist −706 Chiropractic →Reform: How do you know this? Could you point us to a poll of reformers to back this up? Thanks!
7 June 2007
- 22:2922:29, 7 June 2007 diff hist +874 Talk:Chiropractic →Reform Chiro Tidbit: Let me help everyone out on this one - Like a dead fish, NACM doesn't pass the smell test anymore now than it did a year ago.
- 16:0416:04, 7 June 2007 diff hist +615 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM: Two sides to every coin
- 15:5115:51, 7 June 2007 diff hist −653 Chiropractic →Practice styles and schools of thought: Small, tiny, micro? More neutral and accurate since information about NACM can't be verified. If anything, there are probably more in the ACA than in NACM.
- 12:1812:18, 7 June 2007 diff hist +713 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM: Clarified issue of Stephen Barrett's failure to pass his psychiatric boards and my concern regarding legitimacy of NACM and why it should be removed.
- 12:0912:09, 7 June 2007 diff hist +236 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM: Clarified issue of Stephen Barrett's failure to pass his psychiatric boards and my concern regarding legitimacy of NACM
- 04:1204:12, 7 June 2007 diff hist +321 Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard →[[Stephen Barrett]] {{blpwatch-links|Stephen Barrett}}: Stephen Barrett has accepted his board failure, why can't we?
- 03:5703:57, 7 June 2007 diff hist +1,274 Talk:Chiropractic →NACM: NACM fails the smell test of a legitimate organization and should be left out, as it has been for some time for these reasons.
- 03:4103:41, 7 June 2007 diff hist +114 User talk:Steth →Chiropractic and National Association for Chiropractic Medicine: Are you giving the other edit warriors the same advice?
- 03:4003:40, 7 June 2007 diff hist +91 User talk:Hipal →Dubious Association: I hope you are giving the others the same advice
- 03:1703:17, 7 June 2007 diff hist +1,415 User talk:Steth →Chiropractic and National Association for Chiropractic Medicine: Edit war is on flysee and Arthur Rubin's part, not mine
- 03:1303:13, 7 June 2007 diff hist +1,376 User talk:Hipal Sorry Ronz, NACM was not in the article as it appears to be a dubious 'organization'.
6 June 2007
- 23:0423:04, 6 June 2007 diff hist −94 Chiropractic →Practice styles and schools of thought: Sorry, Art. Other than my manners, show proof for NACM inclusion, otherwise OR. I asked many times, pls review talk page. No meetings, elections, seminars?!
3 June 2007
- 23:4923:49, 3 June 2007 diff hist −94 Chiropractic →Practice styles and schools of thought: OR -Remove per talk. Membership's beliefs not public. Bogus 'org'. No meetings/research/seminars/elections. Does fyslee have a personal interest/connection?
26 May 2007
- 03:5603:56, 26 May 2007 diff hist +820 Talk:Stephen Barrett →Next steps re: Board Certification issue: Stephen Barrett's ability to fail his boards, why not exactly a feather in his academic cap, is certainly notable and should be included.
19 May 2007
- 03:0403:04, 19 May 2007 diff hist −94 Chiropractic →Practice styles and schools of thought: Was longer-standing without NACM. Membership nor beliefs of each not made public. How do you know? No meetings/research/seminars/elections.
18 May 2007
- 11:3811:38, 18 May 2007 diff hist −120 Chiropractic →Practice styles and schools of thought: NACM fails reliability - can't be verified per WP. Previously had asked on Talk page for numbers/members/data.
23 April 2007
- 21:4321:43, 23 April 2007 diff hist +725 User talk:Steth →Your [[WP:MEDCABAL|Mediation Cabal]] [[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-04-05 Stephen Barrett|'''case''']]: Moved my reply to my talk page. It was deleted by Ronz from his talk page.
- 17:5517:55, 23 April 2007 diff hist +579 User talk:Hipal →Apologies: Have a cup of tea, mate.
- 16:3916:39, 23 April 2007 diff hist +184 User talk:Steth →Your [[WP:MEDCABAL|Mediation Cabal]] [[Wikipedia:Mediation_Cabal/Cases/2007-04-05 Stephen Barrett|'''case''']]
- 03:5703:57, 23 April 2007 diff hist +400 User talk:Hipal →Apologies
22 April 2007
- 17:2017:20, 22 April 2007 diff hist +202 User talk:Hipal Apologies to Ronz, I have altered the wording on my post.
- 17:1617:16, 22 April 2007 diff hist +35 Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-05 Stephen Barrett →Agree/Disagree: Edited my previous post to depersonalize and indicate it is my opinion
- 12:3112:31, 22 April 2007 diff hist +1,278 Wikipedia talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-04-05 Stephen Barrett →Agree/Disagree: Agree: Board failure is notable
30 March 2007
- 18:3018:30, 30 March 2007 diff hist +1,004 Talk:Stephen Barrett →Request for comment: Board certification: Board failure is a part of Stephen Barrett's CV and should be included in the article
26 March 2007
- 23:1823:18, 26 March 2007 diff hist +347 User talk:Steth →re:[[Talk:Stephen Barrett]]: Former, ex, retired, lapsed, whatever
- 23:0623:06, 26 March 2007 diff hist +35 Talk:Stephen Barrett →Deletion: Re-word. Sorry if I offended you Jokestress, just trying to orient the reader as to Barrett's current status. I felt it was relevant when discussing his inability to pass his boards.
