User contributions for StanIsWell
Appearance
A user with 20 edits. Account created on 16 January 2010.
17 January 2010
- 21:1521:15, 17 January 2010 diff hist −102 Stephen Moorer Undid revision 338427681 by Smatprt (talk) let's see how YOU like it :) Tag: references removed
- 20:3920:39, 17 January 2010 diff hist +206 m Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Life span chart
- 20:1720:17, 17 January 2010 diff hist +355 Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Life span chart: You should know this ...
- 20:0520:05, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1,184 Shakespeare authorship question Undid revision 338416510 by Smatprt (talk) found a playmate ... great !!!
- 20:0220:02, 17 January 2010 diff hist +989 Talk:Shakespeare authorship question Undid revision 338416173 by Smatprt (talk) good game ... anyone else want to play :)
- 19:5719:57, 17 January 2010 diff hist +989 m Talk:Shakespeare authorship question Undid revision 338411605 by Smatprt (talk) defending right to free speech
- 19:4519:45, 17 January 2010 diff hist −112 Shakespeare authorship question Undid revision 338413304 by 216.9.17.103 (talk) naughty
- 19:4419:44, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1,184 Shakespeare authorship question tut tut
- 19:3019:30, 17 January 2010 diff hist +458 User talk:Tom Reedy →Egyptian verdict: OK
- 19:2619:26, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1,023 Shakespeare authorship question I spend my time as I wish ... and this article needs balancing ...
- 19:1819:18, 17 January 2010 diff hist +989 Talk:Shakespeare authorship question Undid revision 338406571 by Smatprt (talk) defending right to free speech
- 18:4518:45, 17 January 2010 diff hist +108 m Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Is the opinion of an editor on an paper he edited allowable in this (or any other) article?
- 18:3918:39, 17 January 2010 diff hist +255 m Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Is the opinion of an editor on an paper he edited allowable in this (or any other) article?
- 18:2418:24, 17 January 2010 diff hist −1,147 Shakespeare authorship question should be enough to start with ... balancing the article
- 18:0118:01, 17 January 2010 diff hist +626 Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Is the opinion of an editor on an paper he edited allowable in this (or any other) article?: well ...
16 January 2010
- 17:2917:29, 16 January 2010 diff hist +136 m Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Smatprt quoting the editor's opinion as a reliable source?
- 17:2017:20, 16 January 2010 diff hist +684 Talk:Shakespeare authorship question →Smatprt quoting the editor's opinion as a reliable source?: well ...
- 17:0917:09, 16 January 2010 diff hist +79 User:StanIsWell tee hee
- 17:0817:08, 16 January 2010 diff hist +451 N User:StanIsWell OK
- 17:0517:05, 16 January 2010 diff hist +22 N User talk:StanIsWell see!