User contributions for Rtmcrrctr
Appearance
A user with 76 edits. Account created on 21 December 2011.
21 September 2012
- 01:5501:55, 21 September 2012 diff hist +3,057 Wikipedia talk:Requests for comment/Rtmcrrctr →Proposed closing statement
18 September 2012
- 23:5123:51, 18 September 2012 diff hist +408 Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rtmcrrctr No edit summary
- 05:4905:49, 18 September 2012 diff hist +1,220 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 05:2905:29, 18 September 2012 diff hist +1,067 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 05:1505:15, 18 September 2012 diff hist +705 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 04:4604:46, 18 September 2012 diff hist +664 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 03:3203:32, 18 September 2012 diff hist +381 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 03:2003:20, 18 September 2012 diff hist +422 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 03:0303:03, 18 September 2012 diff hist +226 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 02:5102:51, 18 September 2012 diff hist +1,221 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 01:0201:02, 18 September 2012 diff hist +2,286 Talk:Paul Ryan →edit request
- 00:2800:28, 18 September 2012 diff hist +1,183 Talk:Paul Ryan Undid revision 513261517 by TheTimesAreAChanging (talk)
17 September 2012
- 06:3306:33, 17 September 2012 diff hist +394 Talk:Paul Ryan →What is the Essential Problem this Article About Paul Ryan? ( - My take, at least)
- 06:1406:14, 17 September 2012 diff hist +343 Talk:Paul Ryan →What is the Essential Problem this Article About Paul Ryan? ( - My take, at least)
- 05:4805:48, 17 September 2012 diff hist +633 Talk:Paul Ryan →What is the Essential Problem this Article About Paul Ryan? ( - My take, at least)
14 September 2012
- 05:4605:46, 14 September 2012 diff hist −1,067 Paul Ryan Removed refs of insignificant praise, insincerely added to deceitfully make this sentence seem innocent and neutral.
11 September 2012
- 22:1222:12, 11 September 2012 diff hist −2,035 Paul Ryan "this will need to improve...", but YOU did not try to improve it, did you? Why not?
8 September 2012
- 01:5801:58, 8 September 2012 diff hist +1,557 User talk:Jojhutton No edit summary
- 01:3101:31, 8 September 2012 diff hist −2,035 Paul Ryan It is you (talk) who is edit-warring. Do not include a controvertial allegation until consensus. Presumption of Innocence, heard about it, you pest?!
- 00:2100:21, 8 September 2012 diff hist −2,035 Paul Ryan It is in a middle of dispute so do not add sentence until sufficient consensus - which currently does not exist - is there.
7 September 2012
- 23:5923:59, 7 September 2012 diff hist −2,035 Paul Ryan Intervention from WP editors please. NO consensus on talk page to include this sentence. Please!
- 23:5523:55, 7 September 2012 diff hist +728 Talk:Paul Ryan →RfC: Critiques of Ryan RNC Speech
- 08:5908:59, 7 September 2012 diff hist +1,013 Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard →Opening comments by Rtmcrrctr
- 08:4908:49, 7 September 2012 diff hist +961 Talk:Paul Ryan →RfC: Critiques of Ryan RNC Speech
- 08:3808:38, 7 September 2012 diff hist +296 Talk:Paul Ryan →RfC: Critiques of Ryan RNC Speech
- 08:1408:14, 7 September 2012 diff hist +426 Talk:Paul Ryan →False claims in speech
- 07:5907:59, 7 September 2012 diff hist +188 Talk:Paul Ryan →RfC: Critiques of Ryan RNC Speech
- 07:3407:34, 7 September 2012 diff hist +692 Talk:Paul Ryan →RfC: Critiques of Ryan RNC Speech
- 06:5206:52, 7 September 2012 diff hist +727 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 06:3106:31, 7 September 2012 diff hist +725 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 06:2006:20, 7 September 2012 diff hist −1,523 Paul Ryan There is NO consensus to criticizing this speech as dishonest. Talk page is very clear about that. Cease and desist. Anyone re-adding this claim should be banned from editing from WP as they are deliberately ignoring a discussion on the Talk page.
5 September 2012
- 06:3706:37, 5 September 2012 diff hist +280 Wikipedia:Neutral point of view/Noticeboard →Paul Ryan and speech reception
- 05:0305:03, 5 September 2012 diff hist +742 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 02:2602:26, 5 September 2012 diff hist +997 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 01:5501:55, 5 September 2012 diff hist −1,349 Paul Ryan Beware of engaging in an Edit War! Play Nice! Go back to the Talk page. Currently there is NO consensus as to including the word "lies" which you seem so desperately keen to add. Discuss in the Talk page before adding.
- 01:5101:51, 5 September 2012 diff hist +945 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 01:2901:29, 5 September 2012 diff hist +1,704 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
- 01:2501:25, 5 September 2012 diff hist −1,350 Paul Ryan A controvertial sentence which doesn't say much more than: "his political supporters liked his speech and his political opponents didn't". Duh! Please discuss in the Talk page before returning this sentence. There is a section for it.
- 01:0901:09, 5 September 2012 diff hist +1,795 Talk:Paul Ryan No edit summary
4 September 2012
- 07:5307:53, 4 September 2012 diff hist +604 User talk:StillStanding-247 No edit summary
- 07:2107:21, 4 September 2012 diff hist +612 User talk:StillStanding-247 →Using Opinion Pieces from News Outlets: new section
- 06:4006:40, 4 September 2012 diff hist −49 Paul Ryan Puh-lease do NOT cite a "Guardian" opinion piece as anything more than just that - namely: opinion. Otherwise, anyone to the right of Joseph Stalin would be a Fascist Liar. Puh-lease.
15 August 2012
- 07:0307:03, 15 August 2012 diff hist −78 Paul Ryan No ref
13 June 2012
- 02:1802:18, 13 June 2012 diff hist −243 Death of Azaria Chamberlain Keep it accurate, referenced and verifiable
22 April 2012
- 04:5004:50, 22 April 2012 diff hist +303 Peter Slipper added reference and minor corrections
- 03:1203:12, 22 April 2012 diff hist +539 Peter Slipper additional allegations made
26 December 2011
- 11:1811:18, 26 December 2011 diff hist +247 MATLAB No edit summary
- 11:0711:07, 26 December 2011 diff hist +920 MATLAB →Semicolons: Elaborted
- 10:4910:49, 26 December 2011 diff hist +129 MATLAB added new section of gui functionality
- 02:0002:00, 26 December 2011 diff hist −384 Andrew Bolt →Litigation: Huh? (maybe rephrase)