User contributions for Pacomc999
A user with 8 edits. Account created on 2 January 2022.
9 January 2022
- 21:5021:50, 9 January 2022 diff hist +367 Talk:Gravitational lens No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:4021:40, 9 January 2022 diff hist +566 Talk:Gravitational lens No edit summary Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 21:1421:14, 9 January 2022 diff hist +662 Talk:Gravitational lens →Half the value given by general relativity
- 20:4320:43, 9 January 2022 diff hist +691 Talk:Gravitational lens →Half the value given by general relativity
- 16:2116:21, 9 January 2022 diff hist +367 User talk:DVdm →Correction to gravitational lensing
- 16:0016:00, 9 January 2022 diff hist −1,008 m Gravitational lens Gravitational lensing is not predicted by Newtonian gravity, which is what is normally what is understood by ''Classical physics''. Some of the results of gravitational lensing can be derived up to a factor of two by applying the equivalence principle directly and doing some semi classical approximations. However, this can not be considered classical physics in any way. The sentence is at best very misleading. Tags: Manual revert Reverted references removed Visual edit
2 January 2022
- 19:4019:40, 2 January 2022 diff hist +336 User talk:DVdm →Correction to gravitational lensing: new section Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
- 18:3318:33, 2 January 2022 diff hist −1,008 m Gravitational lens Gravitational lensing is not predicted by Newtonian gravity, which is what is normally what is understood by ''Classical physics''. Some of the results of gravitational lensing can be derived up to a factor of two by applying the equivalence principle directly and doing some semi classical approximations. However, this can not be considered classical physics in any way. The sentence is at best very misleading. Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
