User contributions for Markeer

A user with 2,674 edits. Account created on 31 October 2005.
Search for contributionsshowhide
⧼contribs-top⧽
⧼contribs-date⧽
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

18 May 2024

20 December 2023

12 October 2023

30 August 2023

29 June 2023

16 June 2023

11 June 2023

2 June 2023

23 May 2023

24 April 2023

8 April 2023

30 March 2023

27 March 2023

19 March 2023

6 February 2023

12 January 2023

8 January 2023

19 November 2022

14 November 2022

26 September 2022

20 September 2022

18 August 2022

17 August 2022

6 August 2022

  • 18:1718:17, 6 August 2022 diff hist −125 Soul Man (film)removing rather odd editorial comment which appears to argue with the previous cited quotation. If one has a citable rebuttal to that quotation they wish to add, go for it, but please don't add WP:OR commentary.

14 June 2022

3 June 2022

  • 18:3618:36, 3 June 2022 diff hist −805 Lazarus (comics)I've looked at the other two sources and see why they were removed. Blogs such as those are against Wikipedia's guidelines for verifiability (see: WP:SPS). With only the one-issue review from Newsarama (an okay source, but again, it's a review of one issue and not actually critiquing the pacing), these are still uncited comments. Take to talk page please. Tag: Manual revert
  • 14:1814:18, 3 June 2022 diff hist −599 Lazarus (comics)Removing what appear to be opinion, OR or bad faith criticism edits. The only citation regarding pacing is a roundup blog entry that mentions a slow down in pace in one issue (and doesn't describe such in as negative). If this critics summation is restored, it needs multiple, and better, citations.

31 May 2022

5 May 2022

1 May 2022

29 April 2022

26 April 2022

25 April 2022

24 April 2022

22 April 2022

21 April 2022

14 April 2022

10 April 2022

  • 16:3816:38, 10 April 2022 diff hist −20 Snow CrashImproving citation (and removing footnote quotation from said citation)
  • 16:2516:25, 10 April 2022 diff hist −97 Snow CrashRemoving these as a) there is a link to the source material in the wiki article blue-linked here and b) there's also a citation to it at end of the very next line. I respect wanting to improve citations, but please avoid doing so unnecessarily as that smacks of WP:Point. This article needs work more than criticism.
(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)